Contradiction with Numbers 23:19
Emphasizes God does not lie or repent, contrasting with the notion of reneging on a promise to enter the land.
Numbers 23:19: God [is] not a man, that he should lie; neither the son of man, that he should repent: hath he said, and shall he not do [it]? or hath he spoken, and shall he not make it good?
Contradiction with Ezekiel 18:20
States individuals will die for their own sin, contradicting the punishment on the generation.
Ezekiel 18:20: The soul that sinneth, it shall die. The son shall not bear the iniquity of the father, neither shall the father bear the iniquity of the son: the righteousness of the righteous shall be upon him, and the wickedness of the wicked shall be upon him.
Contradiction with Jeremiah 31:30
Each will die for his own iniquity, conflicting with the collective punishment referenced.
Jeremiah 31:30: But every one shall die for his own iniquity: every man that eateth the sour grape, his teeth shall be set on edge.
Contradiction with Deuteronomy 24:16
Proclaims children shall not be punished for parents' sins, opposing the generational consequences.
Deuteronomy 24:16: The fathers shall not be put to death for the children, neither shall the children be put to death for the fathers: every man shall be put to death for his own sin.
Paradox #1
The contradiction or inconsistency in Numbers 14:29 could arise from the tension between God’s promise of deliverance to the Israelites and the punishment they receive due to their disobedience. It might seem inconsistent that a chosen people would be severely punished or prevented from entering the promised land after a commitment had been made to them. This could raise questions about the nature of divine justice and mercy.
Paradox #2
The moral conflict in Numbers 14:29 could revolve around the idea of collective punishment. This verse suggests that the entire generation, except a few, would not enter the Promised Land because of their lack of faith, which might be seen as unfair to those individuals within the group who were faithful. This raises questions about justice and whether it is right to hold an entire group accountable for the actions or failings of some members.