Contradiction with Hebrews 10:26
This verse suggests that if we sin willfully after receiving knowledge of the truth, there no longer remains a sacrifice for sins, whereas Numbers 15:27 specifies a sin offering for unintentional sins.
Hebrews 10:26: For if we sin wilfully after that we have received the knowledge of the truth, there remaineth no more sacrifice for sins,
Contradiction with Numbers 15:30-31
These verses indicate that presumptuous sins result in being cut off from the community without atonement, contradicting the provision of a sin offering for a soul who sins unintentionally as stated in Numbers 15:27.
Numbers 15:30-31: But the soul that doeth [ought] presumptuously, [whether he be] born in the land, or a stranger, the same reproacheth the LORD; and that soul shall be cut off from among his people. [presumptuously: Heb. with an high hand]
Paradox #1
The theological conflict could arise from the concept of atonement for unintentional sins versus intentional sins. Some may question why unintentional sins have specific instructions for atonement while intentional sins often have more severe consequences, leading to discussions about God's justice and mercy. This difference raises questions about the nature of sin and forgiveness in the Bible.
Paradox #2
In Numbers 15:27, the verse describes a ritual or sacrifice for unintentional sins. The possible contradiction here is that other parts of the Bible emphasize repentance and forgiveness through faith rather than sacrificial rituals. This could create an inconsistency in how sins are forgiven in different biblical texts, as some passages suggest that forgiveness is granted through belief and prayer rather than rituals.
Paradox #3
This Bible verse allows for forgiveness if someone sins unintentionally by offering a sacrifice. The contradiction could be that it seems unfair to some people because it implies that those who cannot afford a sacrifice might not be forgiven, which raises questions about equality and fairness in forgiveness.