Contradiction with Matthew 12:1-8
Jesus and his disciples plucked ears of corn on the Sabbath, but were not punished, suggesting a different interpretation of Sabbath laws.
Matthew 12:1-8: At that time Jesus went on the sabbath day through the corn; and his disciples were an hungred, and began to pluck the ears of corn, and to eat.
Contradiction with Mark 2:27
"The Sabbath was made for man, and not man for the Sabbath," implying that strict Sabbath restrictions, like the prohibition of gathering wood, may not align with Jesus' teachings.
Mark 2:27: And he said unto them, The sabbath was made for man, and not man for the sabbath:
Contradiction with John 5:17
Jesus states that both He and His Father work on the Sabbath, which contradicts the strict observance implied in Numbers 15:32.
John 5:17: But Jesus answered them, My Father worketh hitherto, and I work.
Contradiction with Romans 14:5
Paul suggests that one person may consider one day more sacred than another, while another may not, advocating personal conviction over strict Sabbath observance.
Romans 14:5: One man esteemeth one day above another: another esteemeth every day [alike]. Let every man be fully persuaded in his own mind. [fully persuaded: or, fully assured]
Contradiction with Colossians 2:16
Paul advises against being judged for Sabbath observance, advocating for freedom in regard to how one observes such days.
Colossians 2:16: Let no man therefore judge you in meat, or in drink, or in respect of an holyday, or of the new moon, or of the sabbath [days]: [in meat...: or, for eating and drinking] [respect: or, part]
Paradox #1
The doctrinal issue with the verse in Numbers 15:32 could revolve around the severity of punishment for breaking the Sabbath. Some might argue that it seems inconsistent with the idea of a merciful and forgiving God. The conflict arises from interpreting whether the law's strictness in this case matches the broader message of love and forgiveness in the Bible.
Paradox #2
The contradiction or inconsistency might relate to differing interpretations about the severity of the punishment for gathering sticks on the Sabbath. In historical context, the harsh penalty may seem disproportionate compared to other offenses, leading to questions about the consistency of justice and punishment in biblical laws.
Paradox #3
The scientific conflict with "Numbers 15:32" could be its approach to punishment for working on the Sabbath. From a scientific perspective, morality and ethics are often considered in the context of their societal impact and human rights, rather than a strict religious mandate. The harsh punishment mentioned may not align with modern views on human rights and proportionality in justice.
Paradox #4
The contradiction in this verse could be seen in the harsh punishment for what might seem like a minor offense, which may conflict with the modern understanding of justice and compassion. This can raise questions about mercy and fairness, and how such rules align with broader moral principles.