Contradiction with John 8:7
Jesus challenges those without sin to cast the first stone, promoting mercy over strict punishment.
John 8:7: So when they continued asking him, he lifted up himself, and said unto them, He that is without sin among you, let him first cast a stone at her.
Contradiction with Matthew 5:39
Jesus teaches to not resist an evil person, which implies a move away from legalistic punishment.
Matthew 5:39: But I say unto you, That ye resist not evil: but whosoever shall smite thee on thy right cheek, turn to him the other also.
Contradiction with Romans 6:14
Under grace, not law, suggesting a departure from strict legal penalties for sin.
Romans 6:14: For sin shall not have dominion over you: for ye are not under the law, but under grace.
Contradiction with Romans 12:21
Calls for overcoming evil with good, rather than strict punitive measures.
Romans 12:21: Be not overcome of evil, but overcome evil with good.
Contradiction with James 2:13
Emphasizes that mercy triumphs over judgment, contrasting with the execution in Numbers 15:36.
James 2:13: For he shall have judgment without mercy, that hath shewed no mercy; and mercy rejoiceth against judgment. [rejoiceth: or, glorieth]
Paradox #1
The possible contradiction with Numbers 15:36 could be related to the severity of punishment for breaking the Sabbath. Some people see a conflict with other biblical teachings about mercy and forgiveness, questioning how the harsh punishment aligns with those values. However, interpretations vary, and many argue that the context of the time and laws given play a role in understanding this passage.
Paradox #2
The contradiction or conflict in this context might be related to the difference between the harshness of the punishment described and other biblical instances where similar offenses did not receive such severe consequences. This could be seen as inconsistent with the overall message of mercy and forgiveness found in some other parts of the Bible.
Paradox #3
The potential contradiction in the referenced verse may be related to the act of stoning as a punishment for breaking the Sabbath by gathering sticks. From a modern perspective, this severe punishment does not align with contemporary human rights principles and the scientific understanding of justice and ethics, which emphasize rehabilitation over physical punishment.
Paradox #4
The moral conflict in this verse arises from the severity of the punishment for what might be seen as a minor offense. Some people find it hard to understand why such a harsh penalty was applied, which seems inconsistent with the ideas of forgiveness and mercy emphasized in other parts of religious teachings.