Contradiction with Proverbs 15:33
While Numbers 16:13 speaks of dissatisfaction with leaving Egypt and questions the leadership's intentions, Proverbs 15:33 teaches humility and instruction as the path to honor, implying the opposite spirit of contentment and acceptance of God's plan.
Proverbs 15:33: The fear of the LORD [is] the instruction of wisdom; and before honour [is] humility.
Contradiction with 1 Thessalonians 5:18
Numbers 16:13 reflects a spirit of complaint and ingratitude, while 1 Thessalonians 5:18 instructs believers to give thanks in all circumstances.
1 Thessalonians 5:18: In every thing give thanks: for this is the will of God in Christ Jesus concerning you.
Contradiction with Philippians 2:14-15
Numbers 16:13 involves grumbling and rebellion, whereas Philippians 2:14-15 calls for believers to do all things without complaining to be blameless and pure.
Philippians 2:14-15: Do all things without murmurings and disputings:
Contradiction with Hebrews 13:5
The grumbling in Numbers 16:13 shows discontent with provisions and leadership, while Hebrews 13:5 advises to be content with what one has, trusting in God's presence and provision.
Hebrews 13:5: [Let your] conversation [be] without covetousness; [and be] content with such things as ye have: for he hath said, I will never leave thee, nor forsake thee.
Contradiction with Luke 12:15
Numbers 16:13 implies a focus on material well-being, contrasting with Luke 12:15, which warns against covetousness and commends a life not centered on material abundance.
Luke 12:15: And he said unto them, Take heed, and beware of covetousness: for a man's life consisteth not in the abundance of the things which he possesseth.
Paradox #1
The contradiction or inconsistency in Numbers 16:13 can be seen if one interprets the verse as showing ingratitude or disrespect towards leadership ordained by God. It reflects a rebellious attitude towards past blessings or leadership that provided care and safety, which might conflict with a broader moral expectation to honor and respect such leadership. This could highlight a potential inconsistency between divine provision and human dissatisfaction.