Contradiction with Numbers 20:12
God's decision for Aaron not to enter the promised land is presented due to another reason, i.e., disbelief at the waters of Meribah, rather than Numbers 20:24's emphasis solely on rebellion.
Numbers 20:12: And the LORD spake unto Moses and Aaron, Because ye believed me not, to sanctify me in the eyes of the children of Israel, therefore ye shall not bring this congregation into the land which I have given them.
Contradiction with Hebrews 11:31
Rahab, who was not an Israelite and had less exposure to Moses' teachings, received grace, contrasting with the seemingly harsh consequence faced by Aaron.
Hebrews 11:31: By faith the harlot Rahab perished not with them that believed not, when she had received the spies with peace. [that...: or, that were disobedient]
Contradiction with Matthew 11:28-30
Jesus speaks of offering rest and a light burden, in contrast with the heavy consequence imposed on Aaron for rebellion.
Matthew 11:28-30: Come unto me, all [ye] that labour and are heavy laden, and I will give you rest.
Paradox #1
The contradiction could stem from the fact that Aaron is punished for an event where only Moses seems to have acted wrongly by striking the rock to bring water, as described earlier in the chapter. This raises questions about why Aaron shares the same punishment. This inconsistency focuses on the fairness and clarity of divine justice depicted in this narrative.
Paradox #2
The contradiction related to this verse may be that it refers to Aaron's death at Mount Hor due to disobedience at Meribah. However, there is an inconsistency in the timeline and location of Aaron's death when compared with other parts of the Old Testament, leading to some confusion over the exact circumstances of his passing.
Paradox #3
One possible contradiction in Numbers 20:24 could be the idea of collective punishment or responsibility. The verse suggests punishing an individual due to the group's broader failings, which some may see as unfair or inconsistent with individual accountability. This could lead to debates about justice and personal responsibility within moral frameworks.