Contradiction with Proverbs 3:6
Proverbs 3:6 states that God will direct your paths, indicating guidance and protection, which seems to contradict the danger Balaam faced in Numbers 22:32.
Proverbs 3:6: In all thy ways acknowledge him, and he shall direct thy paths.
Contradiction with James 1:13
James 1:13 says God does not tempt anyone to do evil, whereas Numbers 22:32 suggests Balaam was on a wrong path due to God's angel.
James 1:13: Let no man say when he is tempted, I am tempted of God: for God cannot be tempted with evil, neither tempteth he any man: [evil: or, evils]
Contradiction with 1 Corinthians 14:33
1 Corinthians 14:33 states God is not the author of confusion, juxtaposing the perplexing situation Balaam encountered with the angel.
1 Corinthians 14:33: For God is not [the author] of confusion, but of peace, as in all churches of the saints. [confusion: Gr. tumult, or, unquietness]
Contradiction with Jeremiah 29:11
Jeremiah 29:11 talks about God’s plans for peace and a hopeful future, contrasting the adversarial warning given to Balaam with armed opposition.
Jeremiah 29:11: For I know the thoughts that I think toward you, saith the LORD, thoughts of peace, and not of evil, to give you an expected end. [expected...: Heb. end and expectation]
Paradox #1
The verse involves an angel confronting Balaam for his actions. A potential contradiction could be seen in why God allowed Balaam to go initially, only to confront him later. This might seem inconsistent with God's intentions or instructions, creating confusion about God's will.
Paradox #2
The potential doctrinal inconsistency in this verse could relate to the concept of divine knowledge and intention. In this story, an angel of the Lord is sent to oppose Balaam, even though Balaam was initially told by God to go. This might seem like God is giving contradictory messages or changing His mind, which some might struggle to reconcile with the idea of God being all-knowing and consistent.
Paradox #3
The contradiction or inconsistency with Numbers 22:32 might involve the talking donkey story. Some people find it hard to believe or reconcile with the norms of historical and biological expectations, as animals typically don't speak human language. This could be seen as a mythological or symbolic element rather than a literal historical event.
Paradox #4
The verse involves a talking donkey, which contradicts scientific understanding since animals, like donkeys, do not possess the anatomical structures or cognitive abilities required for human speech.
Paradox #5
The contradiction in "Numbers 22:32" could be the idea of punishing someone for actions they were not aware were wrong. Balaam is reprimanded by an angel for his actions, even though he was not initially aware that he was doing something wrong, leading to questions about fairness and informed consent in moral judgment.