Contradiction with Genesis 12:3
Numbers 23:9 states Israel is a people dwelling alone, not reckoned among the nations, while Genesis 12:3 promises that all families of the earth will be blessed through Abraham's descendants, indicating an interaction with nations.
Genesis 12:3: And I will bless them that bless thee, and curse him that curseth thee: and in thee shall all families of the earth be blessed.
Contradiction with Isaiah 49:6
Numbers 23:9 suggests separation from nations, but Isaiah 49:6 speaks of Israel as a light to the Gentiles, implying a role among nations.
Isaiah 49:6: And he said, It is a light thing that thou shouldest be my servant to raise up the tribes of Jacob, and to restore the preserved of Israel: I will also give thee for a light to the Gentiles, that thou mayest be my salvation unto the end of the earth. [It is...: or, Art thou lighter than that thou shouldest, etc] [preserved: or, desolations]
Contradiction with Deuteronomy 4:6-7
Numbers 23:9 suggests separation, while Deuteronomy 4:6-7 mentions other nations recognizing Israel's wisdom and understanding.
Deuteronomy 4:6-7: Keep therefore and do [them]; for this [is] your wisdom and your understanding in the sight of the nations, which shall hear all these statutes, and say, Surely this great nation [is] a wise and understanding people.
Contradiction with Jeremiah 1:5
Numbers 23:9 emphasizes Israel's separation, whereas Jeremiah 1:5 highlights a prophetic role for Israel among nations.
Jeremiah 1:5: Before I formed thee in the belly I knew thee; and before thou camest forth out of the womb I sanctified thee, [and] I ordained thee a prophet unto the nations. [ordained: Heb. gave]
Paradox #1
Numbers 23:9 speaks about the people of Israel being set apart and different from other nations. A contradiction or inconsistency might arise when considering the times when Israel sought alliances or was influenced by other cultures and nations, which seems at odds with the idea of being distinct and separate. This could raise questions about the practical application of being distinct throughout history.
Paradox #2
This verse speaks about the distinctiveness and separateness of a group of people. A potential contradiction or conflict could be the idea of exclusivity versus inclusivity. While the verse highlights being set apart, this might be seen as conflicting with values of equality and unity among all people. It could be interpreted as promoting division instead of harmony.