Contradiction with 2 Samuel 7:16
This verse speaks of David's dynasty enduring forever, whereas Numbers 24:17 speaks of a singular star and scepter arising.
2 Samuel 7:16: And thine house and thy kingdom shall be established for ever before thee: thy throne shall be established for ever.
Contradiction with Matthew 24:36
This verse states no one knows the timing of future events, while Numbers 24:17 implies a prophecy of a future king.
Matthew 24:36: But of that day and hour knoweth no [man], no, not the angels of heaven, but my Father only.
Contradiction with John 18:36
This verse says Jesus' kingdom is not of this world, potentially contrasting with the earthly kingdom implied in Numbers 24:17.
John 18:36: Jesus answered, My kingdom is not of this world: if my kingdom were of this world, then would my servants fight, that I should not be delivered to the Jews: but now is my kingdom not from hence.
Contradiction with Hebrews 7:3
This verse states Melchizedek is without descent, which contrasts with Numbers 24:17 that suggests a future leader with a lineage.
Hebrews 7:3: Without father, without mother, without descent, having neither beginning of days, nor end of life; but made like unto the Son of God; abideth a priest continually. [without descent: Gr. without pedigree]
Contradiction with Revelation 11:15
This verse describes the kingdoms of the world becoming Christ's, which could contrast with Numbers 24:17's focus on a particular lineage stemming from Jacob.
Revelation 11:15: And the seventh angel sounded; and there were great voices in heaven, saying, The kingdoms of this world are become [the kingdoms] of our Lord, and of his Christ; and he shall reign for ever and ever.
Paradox #1
Numbers 24:17 is often seen as a prophecy about a future ruler who will come from Israel. Some people argue there's a conflict because different religious groups interpret this prophecy differently, especially concerning who this ruler might be. For instance, Christians often see it as a prophecy about Jesus, while other groups might not agree. This difference in interpretation can create inconsistencies in understanding the verse throughout history.
Paradox #2
The contradiction or conflict in this verse could be seen as the depiction of a conquering ruler or figure bringing destruction upon certain groups, which might clash with themes of peace and love that are found in other parts of the Bible. This could lead to a perceived inconsistency in how different parts of the Bible approach conflict and treatment of enemies.