Contradictions and Paradoxes in Numbers 24:20

Check out Contradictions Catalog of Numbers 24:20 for the comprehensive list of verses that contradicts Numbers 24:20. Some key contradictions and paradoxes are described below.

According to Moses, Amalek was an important group of people long ago, but they would eventually be gone forever. This is because they were enemies of Israel and fought against them.

Numbers 24:20: And when he looked on Amalek, he took up his parable, and said, Amalek [was] the first of the nations; but his latter end [shall be] that he perish for ever. [the nations: the nations that warred against Israel] [that...: or, even to destruction]

Contradiction with Exodus 17:14

This verse contradicts Numbers 24:20 as it commands that the memory of Amalek be utterly blotted out, while Numbers 24:20 implies that Amalek will be destroyed in the future, suggesting an ongoing presence until then.

Exodus 17:14: And the LORD said unto Moses, Write this [for] a memorial in a book, and rehearse [it] in the ears of Joshua: for I will utterly put out the remembrance of Amalek from under heaven.

Contradiction with Deuteronomy 25:19

This verse instructs to blot out the remembrance of Amalek, implying it should have already occurred, conflicting with Numbers 24:20 which expects future destruction.

Deuteronomy 25:19: Therefore it shall be, when the LORD thy God hath given thee rest from all thine enemies round about, in the land which the LORD thy God giveth thee [for] an inheritance to possess it, [that] thou shalt blot out the remembrance of Amalek from under heaven; thou shalt not forget [it].

Contradiction with 1 Samuel 15:3

God commands Saul to destroy Amalek completely, yet Numbers 24:20 implies their destruction is yet to come.

1 Samuel 15:3: Now go and smite Amalek, and utterly destroy all that they have, and spare them not; but slay both man and woman, infant and suckling, ox and sheep, camel and ass.

Contradiction with 1 Samuel 15:8-9

Saul spares Agag, king of the Amalekites, contradicting Numbers 24:20's implication of total destruction by stating a partial destruction instead.

1 Samuel 15:8-9: And he took Agag the king of the Amalekites alive, and utterly destroyed all the people with the edge of the sword.

Contradiction with 2 Samuel 1:10

An Amalekite claims to have killed Saul, contradicting the idea of Amalek's end as prophesied in Numbers 24:20.

2 Samuel 1:10: So I stood upon him, and slew him, because I was sure that he could not live after that he was fallen: and I took the crown that [was] upon his head, and the bracelet that [was] on his arm, and have brought them hither unto my lord.

Contradiction with 1 Samuel 27:8

David invades the land of the Amalekites, contradicting the claim in Numbers 24:20 of their ultimate perdition as they are still present to raid.

1 Samuel 27:8: And David and his men went up, and invaded the Geshurites, and the Gezrites, and the Amalekites: for those [nations were] of old the inhabitants of the land, as thou goest to Shur, even unto the land of Egypt. [Gezrites: or, Gerzites]

Paradox #1

The moral conflict in Numbers 24:20 could be seen as the concept of divine retribution and destruction of a group of people, which may clash with the values of mercy and forgiveness found elsewhere. This inconsistency can raise questions about justice and morality in the text.

Disclaimer: The content provided at PolarBible.com is for educational purposes only. Readers have the full right to agree or disagree with the interpretations and conclusions presented. We take no responsibility for any actions or decisions taken based on the information shared as Polar Verses.