Contradiction with Matthew 5:44
This verse instructs people to love their enemies and bless those who curse them, which contradicts the command in Numbers 25:4 to take action against offenders.
Matthew 5:44: But I say unto you, Love your enemies, bless them that curse you, do good to them that hate you, and pray for them which despitefully use you, and persecute you;
Contradiction with Ezekiel 33:11
God states that He has no pleasure in the death of the wicked, which contrasts with the directive in Numbers 25:4 to punish the wrongdoers.
Ezekiel 33:11: Say unto them, [As] I live, saith the Lord GOD, I have no pleasure in the death of the wicked; but that the wicked turn from his way and live: turn ye, turn ye from your evil ways; for why will ye die, O house of Israel?
Contradiction with Romans 12:19
This verse advises against seeking vengeance, urging believers to leave room for God's wrath, contrary to the immediate punishment in Numbers 25:4.
Romans 12:19: Dearly beloved, avenge not yourselves, but [rather] give place unto wrath: for it is written, Vengeance [is] mine; I will repay, saith the Lord.
Contradiction with Luke 6:36
This verse calls for mercy, conflicting with the punitive measures commanded in Numbers 25:4.
Luke 6:36: Be ye therefore merciful, as your Father also is merciful.
Paradox #1
Numbers 25:4 may raise questions about the nature of a loving and just God ordering harsh punishments. This can seem inconsistent with other parts of the Bible that emphasize mercy and forgiveness. Such verses can be challenging to reconcile with the broader message of compassion and love found in many other passages.
Paradox #2
The potential doctrinal conflict with Numbers 25:4 might arise from the depiction of a severe punishment commanded by God, which could seem inconsistent with teachings about God's mercy and forgiveness. Balancing justice with compassion is a recurring challenge when interpreting biblical texts.
Paradox #3
The contradiction or inconsistency with the verse might involve the consideration of morality and justice from a scientific or modern ethical perspective. In science, actions are often analyzed based on empirical evidence and ethical standards that evolve over time. Commands in ancient texts can conflict with contemporary views on human rights and justice. Scientific thinking typically emphasizes observation, experimentation, and evidence-based conclusions, which contrasts with actions ordered without empirical justification.
Paradox #4
Numbers 25:4 might raise concerns about the morality of divine commands, specifically regarding collective punishment and the execution of individuals as a response to wrongdoing. The conflict can arise from the perspective that punishing people in such a severe manner can seem unjust or harsh when considered against modern ethical beliefs about justice and individual responsibility. This could be seen as inconsistent with the idea of a compassionate and forgiving deity.