Contradiction with Exodus 32:26-28
These verses describe how the Levites carried out violence against idolaters, despite Numbers 26:62 noting their duties were service-oriented and not warlike.
Exodus 32:26-28: Then Moses stood in the gate of the camp, and said, Who [is] on the LORD'S side? [let him come] unto me. And all the sons of Levi gathered themselves together unto him.
Contradiction with Joshua 18:7
This verse states that the Levites have no share in the land, whereas in Numbers 26:62 their focus is on service in the tabernacle, emphasising their separation rather than participation in military duties.
Joshua 18:7: But the Levites have no part among you; for the priesthood of the LORD [is] their inheritance: and Gad, and Reuben, and half the tribe of Manasseh, have received their inheritance beyond Jordan on the east, which Moses the servant of the LORD gave them.
Contradiction with Hebrews 7:5
This verse explains that the Levites receive tithes from the people, contrasting with Numbers 26:62, which details their census for service purposes rather than receiving sustenance.
Hebrews 7:5: And verily they that are of the sons of Levi, who receive the office of the priesthood, have a commandment to take tithes of the people according to the law, that is, of their brethren, though they come out of the loins of Abraham:
Paradox #1
Numbers 26:62 mentions the number of Levite males a month old or more. A contradiction or inconsistency arises when comparing this number to earlier census counts in the Book of Numbers. The earlier count in Numbers 3 gives a different number of Levites, raising questions about the population size and growth of the tribe over a relatively short period. This discrepancy can be puzzling in terms of historical and logistical consistency.
Paradox #2
The potential contradiction or inconsistency could be that this verse discusses a census of a specific group without assigning a direct inheritance of land, which might seem unfair or unequal compared to other groups who receive land allocations. This could raise questions about fairness and equality within the community.