Contradiction with Numbers 36:7
This verse contradicts Numbers 27:6 by emphasizing the importance of inheritance remaining within the original tribe, whereas Numbers 27:6 addresses daughters inheriting when there are no sons.
Numbers 36:7: So shall not the inheritance of the children of Israel remove from tribe to tribe: for every one of the children of Israel shall keep himself to the inheritance of the tribe of his fathers. [keep...: Heb. cleave to the, etc]
Contradiction with Deuteronomy 21:15-17
This passage contradicts Numbers 27:6 by detailing the firstborn son's right to a double portion, placing emphasis on male heirs over the inheritance rights of daughters mentioned in Numbers 27:6.
Deuteronomy 21:15-17: If a man have two wives, one beloved, and another hated, and they have born him children, [both] the beloved and the hated; and [if] the firstborn son be hers that was hated:
Contradiction with Psalm 49:10-11
These verses stress that wealth and inheritance are temporary, which can contradict the notion of established inheritance rights as discussed in Numbers 27:6.
Psalm 49:10-11: For he seeth [that] wise men die, likewise the fool and the brutish person perish, and leave their wealth to others.
Contradiction with 1 Timothy 5:8
This verse emphasizes the responsibility of providing for one’s own household, which could contradict Numbers 27:6 where inheritance laws provide for daughters, possibly outside immediate patriarchal family support.
1 Timothy 5:8: But if any provide not for his own, and specially for those of his own house, he hath denied the faith, and is worse than an infidel. [house: or, kindred]
Contradiction with Galatians 3:28
This verse speaks about equality in Christ, contradicting the gender-specific inheritance rules outlined in Numbers 27:6.
Galatians 3:28: There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female: for ye are all one in Christ Jesus.