Contradiction with Exodus 20:13
This verse contradicts Numbers 31:16 by stating "Thou shalt not kill," challenging actions of war and destruction.
Exodus 20:13: Thou shalt not kill.
Contradiction with Matthew 5:44
This verse instructs to "love your enemies," which contradicts the context of Numbers 31:16 regarding hostility towards the Midianites.
Matthew 5:44: But I say unto you, Love your enemies, bless them that curse you, do good to them that hate you, and pray for them which despitefully use you, and persecute you;
Contradiction with Romans 12:21
This verse advises, "Be not overcome of evil, but overcome evil with good," which contradicts the concept of vengeance or retribution seen in Numbers 31:16.
Romans 12:21: Be not overcome of evil, but overcome evil with good.
Contradiction with 1 John 4:8
This verse states, "He that loveth not knoweth not God; for God is love," highlighting a message of unconditional love that contrasts with the events of Numbers 31:16.
1 John 4:8: He that loveth not knoweth not God; for God is love.
Contradiction with Luke 6:27
This verse advises to "do good to them which hate you," contradicting the war-related actions mentioned in Numbers 31:16.
Luke 6:27: But I say unto you which hear, Love your enemies, do good to them which hate you,
Paradox #1
Numbers 31:16 talks about advice given to the Israelites that led them to sin. A potential contradiction comes when comparing it to verses that emphasize avoiding sin and idolatry. Inconsistency might arise when balancing God’s commands for purity with the actions taken against the Midianites, creating a tension between justice and mercy. This could appear conflicting when viewed against other teachings about love and forgiveness.
Paradox #2
This verse mentions that the actions of certain women led the Israelites to turn away from God, which contradicts earlier sections where the responsibility for the Israelites' wrongdoing is often placed on the community or its leaders rather than outsiders. This inconsistency might be viewed as a shift in blame to external influences rather than addressing internal leadership faults.
Paradox #3
The contradiction in this verse could relate to the concept of divine command versus ethical behavior. Some might see a conflict between the actions commanded and the general moral values of mercy and compassion. This could raise questions about the consistency of applying ethical standards to religious teachings.