Contradiction with Matthew 5:44
While Numbers 31:27 deals with dividing plunder from war, Matthew 5:44 teaches to love and bless enemies, contradicting the idea of engaging in and benefiting from conflict.
Matthew 5:44: But I say unto you, Love your enemies, bless them that curse you, do good to them that hate you, and pray for them which despitefully use you, and persecute you;
Contradiction with Exodus 20:13
This commandment, "Thou shalt not kill," contrasts with the context of war and killing involved in Numbers 31:27.
Exodus 20:13: Thou shalt not kill.
Contradiction with Romans 12:19
Advises against taking vengeance, which contrasts with the distribution of war spoils in Numbers 31:27 that could entail acts of vengeance.
Romans 12:19: Dearly beloved, avenge not yourselves, but [rather] give place unto wrath: for it is written, Vengeance [is] mine; I will repay, saith the Lord.
Contradiction with Isaiah 2:4
The vision of turning swords into plowshares and not learning war contrasts with the act of dividing war captives and spoils in Numbers 31:27.
Isaiah 2:4: And he shall judge among the nations, and shall rebuke many people: and they shall beat their swords into plowshares, and their spears into pruninghooks: nation shall not lift up sword against nation, neither shall they learn war any more. [pruninghooks: or, scythes]
Contradiction with James 4:1
Questions the source of wars and fights, highlighting internal desires, contrary to the organization of war spoils in Numbers 31:27.
James 4:1: From whence [come] wars and fightings among you? [come they] not hence, [even] of your lusts that war in your members? [fightings: or, brawlings] [lusts: or, pleasures]
Paradox #1
One potential contradiction regarding Numbers 31:27 could revolve around the ethical implications of dividing spoils of war, especially when such actions are attributed to divine command. Some people struggle with reconciling this with teachings about love, compassion, and justice found in other parts of the Bible. This raises questions about the consistency of God's character and moral directives in different scriptural contexts.
Paradox #2
The potential doctrinal conflict with Numbers 31:27 could arise from differing views on morality and justice. Some might see ethical issues in the division of spoils after battle, questioning the fairness or morality of distributing goods and people captured in war. This could conflict with modern values of human rights and equality. Thus, the challenge lies in reconciling historical cultural practices with contemporary ethical standards.
Paradox #3
"Numbers 31:27" involves the distribution of spoils of war. The contradiction or conflict could arise from the idea of dividing people and possessions as property, which contrasts with modern views on human rights and ethical treatment of others. This can be seen as inconsistent with the broader biblical teachings of love and compassion for neighbors.