Contradiction with Matthew 5:44
Contradicts Numbers 31:32 in the approach to dealing with enemies; Matthew emphasizes love and prayer for enemies.
Matthew 5:44: But I say unto you, Love your enemies, bless them that curse you, do good to them that hate you, and pray for them which despitefully use you, and persecute you;
Contradiction with Exodus 20:13
Contradicts the act of violence depicted in Numbers 31:32 by adhering to the commandment "Thou shalt not kill."
Exodus 20:13: Thou shalt not kill.
Contradiction with Proverbs 15:1
Contrasts with the approach of conflict in Numbers 31:32 by advocating for a gentle response to wrath.
Proverbs 15:1: A soft answer turneth away wrath: but grievous words stir up anger.
Contradiction with Romans 12:19
Opposes the idea of executing vengeance in Numbers 31:32 by advising to leave vengeance to God.
Romans 12:19: Dearly beloved, avenge not yourselves, but [rather] give place unto wrath: for it is written, Vengeance [is] mine; I will repay, saith the Lord.
Contradiction with Isaiah 2:4
Contradicts Numbers 31:32 by envisioning a future where nations do not engage in war.
Isaiah 2:4: And he shall judge among the nations, and shall rebuke many people: and they shall beat their swords into plowshares, and their spears into pruninghooks: nation shall not lift up sword against nation, neither shall they learn war any more. [pruninghooks: or, scythes]
Contradiction with James 3:17
Opposes the concept of conflict in Numbers 31:32 by describing wisdom from above as peaceable and gentle.
James 3:17: But the wisdom that is from above is first pure, then peaceable, gentle, [and] easy to be intreated, full of mercy and good fruits, without partiality, and without hypocrisy. [partiality: or, wrangling]
Paradox #1
The contradiction or inconsistency might relate to the historical and logistical feasibility of the large numbers of livestock mentioned. Such large numbers could raise questions about the ancient population sizes, resources available at the time, and the capacity to manage and sustain such herds. These aspects can be challenging to reconcile with historical and archaeological evidence.
Paradox #2
This verse is part of a larger story where the Israelites, under Moses' command, attack the Midianites, resulting in the death and capture of many. The contradiction or conflict arises from the commanding and condoning of violence and the taking of captives in this narrative, which contrasts with other biblical teachings that emphasize compassion, peace, and the value of human life. This can lead to questions about the reconciliation of such actions with broader moral and ethical beliefs in the Bible.