Contradiction with Joshua 22:4
This verse suggests that the tribes have rested and can return to their possessions, implying a settling rather than a denial of inheritance.
Joshua 22:4: And now the LORD your God hath given rest unto your brethren, as he promised them: therefore now return ye, and get you unto your tents, [and] unto the land of your possession, which Moses the servant of the LORD gave you on the other side Jordan.
Contradiction with Deuteronomy 33:21
This verse implies that Gad took a portion for themselves that was marked by Moses, contrasting with the denial of inheritance in Numbers 32:19.
Deuteronomy 33:21: And he provided the first part for himself, because there, [in] a portion of the lawgiver, [was he] seated; and he came with the heads of the people, he executed the justice of the LORD, and his judgments with Israel. [seated: Heb. cieled]
Contradiction with Joshua 19:9
Here, the inheritance is shared among tribes of Israel, implying distribution rather than a refusal of inheritance as mentioned in Numbers 32:19.
Joshua 19:9: Out of the portion of the children of Judah [was] the inheritance of the children of Simeon: for the part of the children of Judah was too much for them: therefore the children of Simeon had their inheritance within the inheritance of them.
Contradiction with Judges 2:6
This verse talks about the people going to inherit the land, which suggests settlement rather than a denial of inheritance.
Judges 2:6: And when Joshua had let the people go, the children of Israel went every man unto his inheritance to possess the land.
Contradiction with Joshua 13:8
This passage describes land allocation to tribes east of the Jordan, implying inheritance rather than its denial as in Numbers 32:19.
Joshua 13:8: With whom the Reubenites and the Gadites have received their inheritance, which Moses gave them, beyond Jordan eastward, [even] as Moses the servant of the LORD gave them;