Contradiction with Luke 6:31
Contradicts Numbers 32:29 because it emphasizes treating others as one would want to be treated, whereas Numbers 32:29 involves conditional acceptance.
Luke 6:31: And as ye would that men should do to you, do ye also to them likewise.
Contradiction with Matthew 5:44
Contradicts Numbers 32:29 by urging love for enemies, in contrast to conditional faithfulness.
Matthew 5:44: But I say unto you, Love your enemies, bless them that curse you, do good to them that hate you, and pray for them which despitefully use you, and persecute you;
Contradiction with Romans 12:19
Contradicts Numbers 32:29, which involves human justice, while Romans calls for leaving vengeance to God.
Romans 12:19: Dearly beloved, avenge not yourselves, but [rather] give place unto wrath: for it is written, Vengeance [is] mine; I will repay, saith the Lord.
Contradiction with Matthew 26:52
Contradicts Numbers 32:29 by promoting peace over potential warfare actions implied in the Numbers passage.
Matthew 26:52: Thinkest thou that I cannot now pray to my Father, and he shall presently give me more than twelve legions of angels?
Contradiction with James 2:13
Contradicts Numbers 32:29's conditional actions with the idea that mercy triumphs over judgment.
James 2:13: For he shall have judgment without mercy, that hath shewed no mercy; and mercy rejoiceth against judgment. [rejoiceth: or, glorieth]
Contradiction with Romans 14:1
Contradicts Numbers 32:29 by encouraging acceptance without dispute over opinions, differing from the conditional acceptance in Numbers.
Romans 14:1: Him that is weak in the faith receive ye, [but] not to doubtful disputations. [not...: or, not to judge his doubtful thoughts]
Contradiction with 1 Peter 3:9
Contradicts Numbers 32:29 because it calls for not repaying evil for evil, unlike the conditional nature of the Numbers passage.
1 Peter 3:9: Not rendering evil for evil, or railing for railing: but contrariwise blessing; knowing that ye are thereunto called, that ye should inherit a blessing.
Paradox #1
The moral conflict in Numbers 32:29 could arise from the idea of conditional support among tribes, where assistance and support are contingent upon participation in battle. This could be seen as promoting a form of cooperation that's dependent on military action, which might contrast with ideals of unconditional support or peace.