Contradiction with Matthew 5:44
Numbers 33:55 advocates for driving out enemies, while this verse teaches to love enemies and bless those who curse you.
Matthew 5:44: But I say unto you, Love your enemies, bless them that curse you, do good to them that hate you, and pray for them which despitefully use you, and persecute you;
Contradiction with Romans 12:17-19
While Numbers 33:55 warns of the consequences of not eliminating threats, this passage advises against repaying evil with evil and promotes leaving vengeance to God.
Romans 12:17-19: Recompense to no man evil for evil. Provide things honest in the sight of all men.
Contradiction with Ephesians 6:12
Numbers 33:55 mentions physical adversaries, but this verse shifts focus to spiritual battles, suggesting a different approach to conflicts.
Ephesians 6:12: For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high [places]. [flesh...: Gr. blood and flesh] [spiritual...: or, wicked spirits] [high: or, heavenly]
Contradiction with Luke 6:27-28
Numbers 33:55 suggests dealing harshly with inhabitants, whereas this verse encourages love and prayer for enemies.
Luke 6:27-28: But I say unto you which hear, Love your enemies, do good to them which hate you,
Contradiction with James 1:20
Numbers 33:55's action might be associated with human wrath, but this verse states human anger does not produce righteousness.
James 1:20: For the wrath of man worketh not the righteousness of God.
Contradiction with Proverbs 25:21-22
In contrast to eliminating threats, this Proverb suggests that feeding and helping your enemy turns them into allies, showing a form of overcoming evil with good.
Proverbs 25:21-22: If thine enemy be hungry, give him bread to eat; and if he be thirsty, give him water to drink:
Contradiction with 1 Peter 3:9
Numbers 33:55 recommends a physical response, while this verse encourages not retaliating with evil or insult but with blessing instead.
1 Peter 3:9: Not rendering evil for evil, or railing for railing: but contrariwise blessing; knowing that ye are thereunto called, that ye should inherit a blessing.
Paradox #1
This verse could be seen as conflicting with teachings about love and forgiveness. Specifically, it talks about driving out inhabitants and consequences if not done, which might conflict with messages that emphasize loving one's neighbor and showing mercy. This could lead to questions about how to reconcile these different teachings.
Paradox #2
The potential doctrinal inconsistency might arise when comparing this verse with teachings about love, forgiveness, and coexistence found in other parts of the Bible, such as in the New Testament. The verse might seem to suggest a harsher approach that some could see as conflicting with later messages about peace and turning the other cheek.
Paradox #3
Numbers 33:55 discusses the Israelites driving out inhabitants from the land they are entering. The contradiction or inconsistency could be that archaeological evidence suggests the ancient cities in the region may not have been conquered in the manner described. This raises questions about the historical accuracy of the biblical account compared to archaeological findings.
Paradox #4
The potential scientific conflict with the verse could involve its depiction of human behavior and historical conquest as divinely justified or commanded, which does not align with modern ethical standards and understanding of human rights. Science, particularly social sciences, emphasizes empathy, coexistence, and understanding over conflict and conquest.
Paradox #5
Numbers 33:55 has a contradiction because it suggests forcibly removing or driving out people from their land, which can conflict with ideas of kindness, compassion, and respecting others' rights. This can clash with broader teachings about love and treating others how you would want to be treated.