Contradiction with Matthew 5:5
Blessed are the meek: for they shall inherit the earth. Contradiction with Numbers 34:3 may be interpreted in the sense that Matthew 5:5 suggests a broader, non-geographic, and more inclusive inheritance opposed to the specific land allocation in Numbers.
Matthew 5:5: Blessed [are] the meek: for they shall inherit the earth.
Contradiction with Hebrews 11:16
But now they desire a better country, that is, an heavenly: wherefore God is not ashamed to be called their God: for he hath prepared for them a city. Hebrews 11:16 contrasts as it speaks of a heavenly inheritance beyond earthly land, counter to the earthly, specific land inheritance in Numbers 34:3.
Hebrews 11:16: But now they desire a better [country], that is, an heavenly: wherefore God is not ashamed to be called their God: for he hath prepared for them a city.
Contradiction with John 18:36
Jesus answered, My kingdom is not of this world: if my kingdom were of this world, then would my servants fight, that I should not be delivered to the Jews: but now is my kingdom not from hence. This verse presents a kingdom not defined by earthly territories, which is a different perspective than the earthly land allotment in Numbers 34:3.
John 18:36: Jesus answered, My kingdom is not of this world: if my kingdom were of this world, then would my servants fight, that I should not be delivered to the Jews: but now is my kingdom not from hence.
Paradox #1
The contradiction or inconsistency in Numbers 34:3 could arise from the issue of land ownership and territorial boundaries, which might conflict with modern views on indigenous rights and peaceful coexistence. In today's context, the idea of dividing and claiming land can raise questions about fairness, historical grievances, and respect for existing inhabitants.