Contradiction with Exodus 21:12
This verse states that anyone who strikes a person and kills him shall be put to death, which contradicts the idea of cities of refuge in Numbers 35:15 providing asylum for manslayers.
Exodus 21:12: He that smiteth a man, so that he die, shall be surely put to death.
Contradiction with Leviticus 24:17
This verse emphasizes that whoever kills any man shall surely be put to death, contrasting the concept of refuge for accidental killers in Numbers 35:15.
Leviticus 24:17: And he that killeth any man shall surely be put to death. [killeth...: Heb. smiteth the life of a man]
Contradiction with Deuteronomy 19:11–12
These verses imply that if a man hates his neighbor and lies in wait for him, he cannot seek refuge, which indirectly challenges the sanctuary offered in Numbers 35:15 for unintentional killers by focusing on intent.
Paradox #1
Numbers 35:15 discusses the provision of refuge for those who accidentally commit manslaughter, distinguishing them from intentional murderers. A potential contradiction could arise from the perception of fairness, as it might seem unfair that someone who accidentally took a life is allowed a form of protection or escape, while the family of the victim may feel justice is not fully served. This raises questions about the balance between compassion for the perpetrator’s lack of intent and justice for the victim’s family.