Contradictions and Paradoxes in Numbers 35:26

Check out Contradictions Catalog of Numbers 35:26 for the comprehensive list of verses that contradicts Numbers 35:26. Some key contradictions and paradoxes are described below.

According to the author of the Book of Numbers, if a person who accidentally hurt someone leaves the safe city where they went to hide, they are no longer protected. This means they could be in danger if they step outside those safe city limits.

Numbers 35:26: But if the slayer shall at any time come without the border of the city of his refuge, whither he was fled;

Contradiction with Exodus 21:13

If a person did not intend harm and God allowed it to happen, a place of refuge is given, contrasting with leaving the city of refuge in Numbers 35:26 which incurs consequences.

Exodus 21:13: And if a man lie not in wait, but God deliver [him] into his hand; then I will appoint thee a place whither he shall flee.

Contradiction with Deuteronomy 4:42

Provides a way for the manslayer to flee and live, focusing on protection unlike the restriction of movement in Numbers 35:26.

Deuteronomy 4:42: That the slayer might flee thither, which should kill his neighbour unawares, and hated him not in times past; and that fleeing unto one of these cities he might live:

Contradiction with Joshua 20:5

Emphasizes protection for someone who killed unintentionally until they face the congregation, while Numbers 35:26 emphasizes consequences when leaving refuge boundaries.

Joshua 20:5: And if the avenger of blood pursue after him, then they shall not deliver the slayer up into his hand; because he smote his neighbour unwittingly, and hated him not beforetime.

Contradiction with 1 Kings 2:28-34

Joab is killed even though he takes hold of the altar for refuge, contradicting the idea of staying in one place for safety as expected in Numbers 35:26.

1 Kings 2:28-34: Then tidings came to Joab: for Joab had turned after Adonijah, though he turned not after Absalom. And Joab fled unto the tabernacle of the LORD, and caught hold on the horns of the altar.

Contradiction with Matthew 5:38-39

Teaches turning the other cheek and not seeking retribution, contrasting with the consequence of death for leaving refuge in Numbers 35:26.

Matthew 5:38-39: Ye have heard that it hath been said, An eye for an eye, and a tooth for a tooth:

Paradox #1

The contradiction in this context could be related to the laws about refuge cities and how they handle justice. Some might see a conflict between compassion and strict justice, as the law allows an avenger of blood to kill someone who has left the city of refuge, highlighting a tension between mercy and retribution.

← Numbers 35:25
Share
Numbers 35:27 →
Disclaimer: The content provided at PolarBible.com is for educational purposes only. Readers have the full right to agree or disagree with the interpretations and conclusions presented. We take no responsibility for any actions or decisions taken based on the information shared as Polar Verses.