Contradiction with Matthew 5:38-39
Numbers 35:29 calls for adherence to justice through established laws, whereas Matthew 5:38-39 encourages personal forgiveness over legal retribution.
Matthew 5:38-39: Ye have heard that it hath been said, An eye for an eye, and a tooth for a tooth:
Contradiction with John 8:3-11
Numbers 35:29 emphasizes following legal judgments, but John 8:3-11 depicts Jesus challenging strict legalism in favor of mercy.
John 8:3-11: And the scribes and Pharisees brought unto him a woman taken in adultery; and when they had set her in the midst,
Contradiction with James 2:13
Numbers 35:29 insists on executing judgments based on laws, while James 2:13 stresses mercy triumphing over judgment.
James 2:13: For he shall have judgment without mercy, that hath shewed no mercy; and mercy rejoiceth against judgment. [rejoiceth: or, glorieth]
Contradiction with Romans 12:19
Numbers 35:29 mandates the following of legal procedures, whereas Romans 12:19 advises against seeking personal vengeance, leaving it to God.
Romans 12:19: Dearly beloved, avenge not yourselves, but [rather] give place unto wrath: for it is written, Vengeance [is] mine; I will repay, saith the Lord.
Paradox #1
Numbers 35:29 discusses legal principles for dealing with certain crimes. A possible contradiction or conflict could arise if someone believes that applying ancient legal principles to modern society might not align with contemporary views on justice, fairness, or human rights, potentially leading to questions about their morality.