Contradiction with Deuteronomy 19:15
This verse states that at the mouth of two witnesses, or at the mouth of three witnesses, shall a matter be established, allowing for more than one witness to uphold a case.
Deuteronomy 19:15: One witness shall not rise up against a man for any iniquity, or for any sin, in any sin that he sinneth: at the mouth of two witnesses, or at the mouth of three witnesses, shall the matter be established.
Contradiction with John 8:17
This verse affirms the law that the testimony of two men is true, suggesting the requirement for multiple witnesses in legal matters, contrasting with relying on a single witness in Numbers 35:30.
John 8:17: It is also written in your law, that the testimony of two men is true.
Contradiction with Matthew 18:16
This verse advises taking one or two more witnesses to establish every word, implying the necessity for corroboration, contrary to accepting a singular witness in capital cases like in Numbers 35:30.
Matthew 18:16: But if he will not hear [thee, then] take with thee one or two more, that in the mouth of two or three witnesses every word may be established.
Contradiction with 2 Corinthians 13:1
This verse reiterates that every word shall be established by two or three witnesses, underscoring the necessity for multiple testimonies, which differs from the single witness stipulation in Numbers 35:30.
2 Corinthians 13:1: This [is] the third [time] I am coming to you. In the mouth of two or three witnesses shall every word be established.
Paradox #1
The contradiction or inconsistency with Numbers 35:30 could lie in the different standards of evidence required for capital punishment. In ancient times, this verse might conflict with other cultures' legal practices where different rules of evidence were accepted. Furthermore, there might be inconsistencies with how evidence and witnesses are treated in other parts of the Bible or in comparison with modern legal systems.
Paradox #2
Numbers 35:30 could present a moral conflict because it requires multiple witnesses to convict someone of murder. This might be seen as a contradiction if compared to other parts of the Bible where individual testimony is considered valid or where God acts as the sole judge without human witnesses. It raises questions about the consistency of justice and the value of human versus divine judgment.