Contradiction with Exodus 20:13
Numbers 35:31 calls for no ransom for a murderer, implying value in capital punishment, while Exodus 20:13 commands "Thou shalt not kill," suggesting the sanctity of life.
Exodus 20:13: Thou shalt not kill.
Contradiction with Matthew 5:39
Numbers 35:31 speaks of justice through punishment, whereas Matthew 5:39 advises against retaliation, urging to turn the other cheek instead.
Matthew 5:39: But I say unto you, That ye resist not evil: but whosoever shall smite thee on thy right cheek, turn to him the other also.
Contradiction with Ezekiel 18:32
While Numbers 35:31 does not allow a ransom for a murderer, suggesting their death, Ezekiel 18:32 states that God takes no pleasure in the death of anyone, implying an opportunity for repentance.
Ezekiel 18:32: For I have no pleasure in the death of him that dieth, saith the Lord GOD: wherefore turn [yourselves], and live ye. [yourselves: or, others]
Contradiction with Matthew 5:7
Numbers 35:31 upholds that mercy shouldn't be shown to a murderer, contrasting with Matthew 5:7, which says the merciful will be shown mercy.
Matthew 5:7: Blessed [are] the merciful: for they shall obtain mercy.
Paradox #1
Numbers 35:31 might be seen as inconsistent with later biblical themes of mercy and forgiveness. In the New Testament, for example, there's a significant emphasis on forgiveness and redemption through Jesus Christ, which could seem at odds with the strictness and severity found in the verse. This contrast between justice and mercy can be viewed as a theological tension.
Paradox #2
Numbers 35:31 discusses the idea that no ransom can be accepted for the life of a person who has committed murder. A potential doctrinal conflict arises when this is compared to the New Testament teachings on forgiveness and redemption through Jesus. In the New Testament, it is taught that all sins can be forgiven through faith and repentance. This could create an inconsistency regarding whether a murderer can be forgiven and redeemed or if they must face an absolute penalty without the possibility of atonement.
Paradox #3
Historical contradictions or inconsistencies related to Numbers 35:31 might revolve around differing interpretations of justice and capital punishment. In various parts of the Bible, the laws or guidelines around justice and punishment can sometimes appear inconsistent or are interpreted differently, which may lead to debates or conflicting views among scholars and religious followers about the application of these laws in historical and modern contexts.
Paradox #4
Numbers 35:31 might raise moral questions because it speaks about not accepting a ransom or payment for the life of a murderer who deserves to die. Some might see a contradiction here if they value the idea of mercy or rehabilitation over strict justice. People may argue that every person deserves a chance for redemption or that justice should allow for flexibility and compassion, which could conflict with this strict mandate.