Contradictions and Paradoxes in Numbers 35:32

Check out Contradictions Catalog of Numbers 35:32 for the comprehensive list of verses that contradicts Numbers 35:32. Some key contradictions and paradoxes are described below.

According to the author of the book of Numbers, this verse means that if someone runs to a special safe city because they made a mistake, people can’t take money from them to let them come back home until the high priest dies. This rule helped keep everyone safe and fair.

Numbers 35:32: And ye shall take no satisfaction for him that is fled to the city of his refuge, that he should come again to dwell in the land, until the death of the priest.

Contradiction with Deuteronomy 16:19

This verse speaks against accepting bribes, whereas Numbers 35:32 forbids taking satisfaction to let a murderer return to his property.

Deuteronomy 16:19: Thou shalt not wrest judgment; thou shalt not respect persons, neither take a gift: for a gift doth blind the eyes of the wise, and pervert the words of the righteous. [words: or, matters]

Contradiction with Exodus 23:8

This verse warns against bribery as it blinds and perverts justice, contrasting with the principle in Numbers 35:32 regarding not allowing monetary compensation for serious crimes.

Exodus 23:8: And thou shalt take no gift: for the gift blindeth the wise, and perverteth the words of the righteous. [the wise: Heb. the seeing]

Contradiction with Proverbs 17:23

This verse indicates taking gifts can pervert justice, which can be contrary to the principle in Numbers 35:32 against taking any ransom to pardon a murderer.

Proverbs 17:23: A wicked [man] taketh a gift out of the bosom to pervert the ways of judgment.

Contradiction with Isaiah 1:23

Leaders are criticized for taking bribes, similar to Numbers 35:32's directive against accepting payment for a murderer, but it implies acceptance of such might happen elsewhere.

Isaiah 1:23: Thy princes [are] rebellious, and companions of thieves: every one loveth gifts, and followeth after rewards: they judge not the fatherless, neither doth the cause of the widow come unto them.

Contradiction with Micah 7:3

This verse talks about doing evil with both hands actively, including the acceptance of bribes, contrasting with the uncompromising stance in Numbers 35:32.

Micah 7:3: That they may do evil with both hands earnestly, the prince asketh, and the judge [asketh] for a reward; and the great [man], he uttereth his mischievous desire: so they wrap it up. [his...: Heb. the mischief of his soul]

Paradox #1

Numbers 35:32 discusses the prohibition of accepting a ransom to release someone who has fled to a city of refuge. A potential contradiction could arise with the concept of forgiveness and redemption elsewhere in the Bible, where forgiveness and mercy are available through repentance and sometimes involve making amends or paying a penalty. The conflict here is between the uncompromising rule about not allowing a ransom for someone guilty of accidental killing and the broader biblical themes of mercy and forgiveness.

Paradox #2

The contradiction in Numbers 35:32 might revolve around the idea of justice and fairness. The verse suggests the possibility of a person buying their way out of a punishment, which could conflict with the concept of equal justice for everyone. This could be seen as unfair because it allows wealth to influence or alter what should be a just outcome, potentially favoring the rich over the poor.

Disclaimer: The content provided at PolarBible.com is for educational purposes only. Readers have the full right to agree or disagree with the interpretations and conclusions presented. We take no responsibility for any actions or decisions taken based on the information shared as Polar Verses.