Contradiction with Matthew 7:1
This verse advises against judging others, contrasting with Numbers 5:14 where suspicion initiates a trial.
Matthew 7:1: Judge not, that ye be not judged.
Contradiction with John 8:7
This verse emphasizes forgiveness and self-reflection, contradicting the accusatory nature of Numbers 5:14.
John 8:7: So when they continued asking him, he lifted up himself, and said unto them, He that is without sin among you, let him first cast a stone at her.
Contradiction with James 4:11
This verse warns against speaking evil and judging others, opposite to the suspicion-driven context of Numbers 5:14.
James 4:11: Speak not evil one of another, brethren. He that speaketh evil of [his] brother, and judgeth his brother, speaketh evil of the law, and judgeth the law: but if thou judge the law, thou art not a doer of the law, but a judge.
Contradiction with Proverbs 11:13
This verse highlights the importance of confidentiality, contrasting with the public trial process in Numbers 5:14.
Proverbs 11:13: A talebearer revealeth secrets: but he that is of a faithful spirit concealeth the matter. [A talebearer: Heb. He that walketh, being a talebearer]
Contradiction with 1 Corinthians 13:5
This verse promotes love that keeps no records of wrongs, contradicting the presumption and process in Numbers 5:14.
1 Corinthians 13:5: Doth not behave itself unseemly, seeketh not her own, is not easily provoked, thinketh no evil;
Contradiction with Galatians 5:22-23
These verses emphasize the fruit of the Spirit, including peace, which contrasts with the jealousy and conflict suggested in Numbers 5:14.
Galatians 5:22-23: But the fruit of the Spirit is love, joy, peace, longsuffering, gentleness, goodness, faith,
Contradiction with Romans 14:13
This verse advises not to judge or cause others to stumble, contrary to the accusative process in Numbers 5:14.
Romans 14:13: Let us not therefore judge one another any more: but judge this rather, that no man put a stumblingblock or an occasion to fall in [his] brother's way.
Paradox #1
The verse might raise concerns about fairness and justice, as it deals with suspicion of infidelity without requiring evidence. It could be seen as biased because it relies heavily on the husband's feelings rather than facts. This might seem inconsistent with the broader biblical themes of justice and truth.
Paradox #2
The conflict might stem from the process described, which relies on a ritual to determine a person's guilt. Scientifically, guilt or innocence cannot be determined through rituals or curses, but requires evidence and investigation. The reliance on such a practice contrasts with modern scientific and legal methods of establishing truth.
Paradox #3
The contradiction in this verse could arise from the issue of gender inequality. It describes a situation where a husband suspects his wife of infidelity and a ritual is performed to test her guilt or innocence. The concern is that it places the burden of proof and potential punishment on the woman, without needing evidence beyond the husband's suspicion. This could be seen as unjust and biased against women, conflicting with modern views on fairness and equality.