Contradiction with Matthew 5:44
Contradicts Numbers 5:15 by advocating love and prayer for those who wrong us, in opposition to bringing a case before a priest.
Matthew 5:44: But I say unto you, Love your enemies, bless them that curse you, do good to them that hate you, and pray for them which despitefully use you, and persecute you;
Contradiction with Matthew 7:12
Contradicts Numbers 5:15 by promoting the Golden Rule to treat others how one wishes to be treated, rather than resorting to ritual or legalistic actions.
Matthew 7:12: Therefore all things whatsoever ye would that men should do to you, do ye even so to them: for this is the law and the prophets.
Contradiction with James 2:8
Contradicts Numbers 5:15 by endorsing the royal law of love your neighbor as yourself, which conflicts with ritualistic suspicion of a spouse.
James 2:8: If ye fulfil the royal law according to the scripture, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself, ye do well:
Contradiction with 1 Corinthians 13:4-5
Contradicts Numbers 5:15 by emphasizing love's characteristics, such as not being easily angered, which contrasts with the jealous offering procedure.
1 Corinthians 13:4-5: Charity suffereth long, [and] is kind; charity envieth not; charity vaunteth not itself, is not puffed up, [vaunteth...: or, is not rash]
Contradiction with Romans 12:17-19
Contradicts Numbers 5:15 by instructing not to repay evil for evil, but to live peaceably, unlike the trial of jealousy.
Romans 12:17-19: Recompense to no man evil for evil. Provide things honest in the sight of all men.
Paradox #1
One potential contradiction in Numbers 5:15 might relate to the ritual described, which involves using a concoction as a test for faithfulness or guilt. From a scientific perspective, relying on a physical substance to determine guilt or innocence isn't consistent with modern understanding of chemistry and psychology, as no drink or physical item can accurately reveal someone’s character or actions.
Paradox #2
The contradiction in Numbers 5:15 could be seen in the treatment of women. The verse is part of a ritual for suspected adultery, where women are subjected to a public ordeal based on suspicion alone, potentially treating them unfairly. It may seem inconsistent with ideas of fairness and justice that are valued today.