Contradiction with John 8:7
This verse contradicts the punitive and judgmental nature of Numbers 5:17, emphasizing forgiveness and urging those without sin to cast the first stone.
John 8:7: So when they continued asking him, he lifted up himself, and said unto them, He that is without sin among you, let him first cast a stone at her.
Contradiction with Matthew 7:1-2
These verses contradict the notion of judgment found in Numbers 5:17, as they warn against judging others lest you be judged similarly.
Matthew 7:1-2: Judge not, that ye be not judged.
Contradiction with 1 Corinthians 13:4-5
These verses highlight love's forgiving and non-record-keeping nature, contrasting with the judicial process aimed at proving guilt in Numbers 5:17.
1 Corinthians 13:4-5: Charity suffereth long, [and] is kind; charity envieth not; charity vaunteth not itself, is not puffed up, [vaunteth...: or, is not rash]
Contradiction with James 2:13
This verse contrasts the legalistic procedure in Numbers 5:17 with the admonition that mercy triumphs over judgment.
James 2:13: For he shall have judgment without mercy, that hath shewed no mercy; and mercy rejoiceth against judgment. [rejoiceth: or, glorieth]
Contradiction with Romans 2:1
This verse suggests that judging others, as seen in Numbers 5:17, leads to self-condemnation, contrasting with the ritual's underlying motives.
Romans 2:1: Therefore thou art inexcusable, O man, whosoever thou art that judgest: for wherein thou judgest another, thou condemnest thyself; for thou that judgest doest the same things.
Paradox #1
The possible contradiction with this verse involves the use of "holy water" and dust from the tabernacle floor as a test for faithfulness. Scientifically, there is no evidence that such mixtures have any inherent properties to determine truth or guilt in such matters. This practice conflicts with scientific understanding of human biology and psychology.
Paradox #2
This verse is part of a passage that describes a ritual involving a "bitter water" test for a woman accused of adultery. The contradiction or conflict arises from the perceived inequity and harshness of the test, as it seems to specifically target women and relies on a supernatural procedure to prove guilt or innocence, potentially lacking fairness and compassion.