Contradiction with Matthew 7:1
This verse advocates for not judging others, which contradicts the judicial action implied in Numbers 5:21.
Matthew 7:1: Judge not, that ye be not judged.
Contradiction with John 8:7
This verse suggests that only those without sin should execute judgment, differing from the testing procedure in Numbers 5:21.
John 8:7: So when they continued asking him, he lifted up himself, and said unto them, He that is without sin among you, let him first cast a stone at her.
Contradiction with James 4:12
It states there is one lawgiver and judge, countering the human judicial process described in Numbers 5:21.
James 4:12: There is one lawgiver, who is able to save and to destroy: who art thou that judgest another?
Paradox #1
This verse can be viewed as inconsistent with modern understandings of justice and gender equality. It describes a ritual for suspected adultery that targets women and may seem unfairly punitive or superstitious by today's standards. This can conflict with the broader biblical themes of mercy, compassion, and justice.
Paradox #2
The contradiction or inconsistency related to this verse could be the cultural and ethical views on the treatment and rights of women. The passage describes a ritual that seems to be unfair and punitive specifically toward women, reflecting ancient societal norms that contradict modern views on gender equality and justice. This can create conflict when interpreting or reconciling such historical practices with contemporary values.
Paradox #3
The contradiction in Numbers 5:21 could be the belief that a ritual involving a curse and drinking a special water mixture can physically affect a woman's body in specific, adverse ways. Modern science does not support the idea that spoken words or drinking a certain liquid can directly cause physical symptoms or conditions, such as those described in the text, in a supernatural manner.
Paradox #4
The contradiction in Numbers 5:21 could be seen in the treatment of women. It describes a ritual that could be considered unfair or humiliating to a woman accused of infidelity, whether she is guilty or not. This might conflict with modern views on justice and equality.