Contradiction with John 6:37
This verse states that Jesus will not cast out anyone who comes to him, contradicting the exclusion commanded in Numbers 5:3.
John 6:37: All that the Father giveth me shall come to me; and him that cometh to me I will in no wise cast out.
Contradiction with Galatians 3:28
This verse emphasizes that all are one in Christ, contradicting the separation of individuals mentioned in Numbers 5:3.
Galatians 3:28: There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female: for ye are all one in Christ Jesus.
Contradiction with Matthew 11:28
This verse invites all who are weary and burdened to come to Jesus, differing from the exclusion of certain individuals in Numbers 5:3.
Matthew 11:28: Come unto me, all [ye] that labour and are heavy laden, and I will give you rest.
Contradiction with Acts 10:34-35
This verse emphasizes that God does not show favoritism, opposing the act of separating certain people in Numbers 5:3.
Acts 10:34-35: Then Peter opened [his] mouth, and said, Of a truth I perceive that God is no respecter of persons:
Contradiction with Romans 15:7
This verse encourages acceptance of one another, unlike the exclusion commanded in Numbers 5:3.
Romans 15:7: Wherefore receive ye one another, as Christ also received us to the glory of God.
Paradox #1
Numbers 5:3 might be seen as inconsistent with the broader biblical themes of inclusion and compassion, as it involves excluding certain individuals from the community. This could appear to conflict with teachings about God's love and acceptance, especially seen in the New Testament where Jesus reaches out to and heals the marginalized and unclean.
Paradox #2
Numbers 5:3 can be seen as having a contradiction or conflict with later teachings in the Bible about inclusion and acceptance. In the New Testament, particularly in the teachings of Jesus, there is an emphasis on compassion and embracing those who are unclean or marginalized. This contrasts with the idea in Numbers 5:3 of excluding unclean individuals from the camp, highlighting a shift from exclusion to inclusion in biblical narratives.
Paradox #3
The potential contradiction in Numbers 5:3 could relate to the idea of contagious impurity, where people were separated due to conditions like skin diseases, believed to be communicable. Modern science understands that not all such conditions are contagious or require isolation, and treatment practices are based on specific medical evidence rather than ritual purity. Thus, the ancient practice might conflict with contemporary medical knowledge about transmission and treatment of diseases.
Paradox #4
The contradiction in this verse could relate to issues of discrimination and fairness. It might appear unfair or prejudiced to separate people based on physical conditions or perceived impurities, which conflicts with modern values of equality and inclusivity. The verse may seem to endorse exclusion, which contrasts with the moral principles of love and acceptance found elsewhere.