Contradictions and Paradoxes in Numbers 5:31

Check out Contradictions Catalog of Numbers 5:31 for the comprehensive list of verses that contradicts Numbers 5:31. Some key contradictions and paradoxes are described below.

According to Moses, this means that if a man thinks his wife did something wrong but she really didn't, he won't be blamed for it, but if the wife did do something wrong, she will have to accept the consequences.

Numbers 5:31: Then shall the man be guiltless from iniquity, and this woman shall bear her iniquity.

Contradiction with Galatians 3:28

This verse speaks of equality in Christ, contradicting the idea of differing treatment based on gender seen in Numbers 5.

Galatians 3:28: There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female: for ye are all one in Christ Jesus.

Contradiction with John 8:7

This verse advocates for forgiveness and mercy rather than judgment, contradicting the ritual of judgment and potential punishment described in Numbers 5.

John 8:7: So when they continued asking him, he lifted up himself, and said unto them, He that is without sin among you, let him first cast a stone at her.

Contradiction with Romans 2:11

This verse states that God shows no partiality, which contradicts the seeming gender bias in Numbers 5.

Romans 2:11: For there is no respect of persons with God.

Contradiction with James 2:13

This verse emphasizes mercy over judgment, which contradicts the execution of judgment seen in Numbers 5.

James 2:13: For he shall have judgment without mercy, that hath shewed no mercy; and mercy rejoiceth against judgment. [rejoiceth: or, glorieth]

Contradiction with Micah 6:8

This verse calls for justice, mercy, and humility, contrasting with the trial by ordeal presented in Numbers 5.

Micah 6:8: He hath shewed thee, O man, what [is] good; and what doth the LORD require of thee, but to do justly, and to love mercy, and to walk humbly with thy God? [walk...: Heb. humble thyself to walk]

Paradox #1

Numbers 5:31 could be seen as a contradiction or inconsistency because it discusses the ritual for a woman suspected of adultery, focusing on her ordeal but does not equally address the husband's fidelity. This might seem unfair or inconsistent, as it imposes a specific test only on women and not on men, reflecting cultural norms of that time but conflicting with modern views on equality and justice.

Paradox #2

This verse could be seen as morally inconsistent because it appears to absolve a husband of guilt in the process described, while the wife's outcome depends on a ritual's result. This might conflict with modern views on fairness and equality in marriage and accountability.

Disclaimer: The content provided at PolarBible.com is for educational purposes only. Readers have the full right to agree or disagree with the interpretations and conclusions presented. We take no responsibility for any actions or decisions taken based on the information shared as Polar Verses.