Contradiction with Matthew 5:39
This verse advises against resisting evil with violence, rather turning the other cheek, which contrasts with the acceptance of physical punishment for instruction seen in Proverbs 20:30.
Matthew 5:39: But I say unto you, That ye resist not evil: but whosoever shall smite thee on thy right cheek, turn to him the other also.
Contradiction with Romans 12:19
This verse teaches to leave vengeance to God and not to seek personal retribution, opposing the idea of administering physical discipline found in Proverbs 20:30.
Romans 12:19: Dearly beloved, avenge not yourselves, but [rather] give place unto wrath: for it is written, Vengeance [is] mine; I will repay, saith the Lord.
Contradiction with Ephesians 4:32
This verse emphasizes kindness and forgiveness, contrary to inflicting physical pain as a corrective measure suggested in Proverbs 20:30.
Ephesians 4:32: And be ye kind one to another, tenderhearted, forgiving one another, even as God for Christ's sake hath forgiven you.
Contradiction with 1 Peter 3:9
This verse encourages not returning evil for evil but blessing others, which is at odds with the acceptance of bodily punishment implied in Proverbs 20:30.
1 Peter 3:9: Not rendering evil for evil, or railing for railing: but contrariwise blessing; knowing that ye are thereunto called, that ye should inherit a blessing.
Contradiction with James 1:20
This verse suggests that human anger does not bring about the righteousness that God desires, contrasting with corrective violence suggested in Proverbs 20:30.
James 1:20: For the wrath of man worketh not the righteousness of God.
Paradox #1
Some people might find a contradiction between the idea in this verse and the overall message of kindness and forgiveness in other parts of the Bible. The verse suggests a harsh approach that might conflict with teachings about love and compassion.
Paradox #2
Some people see a contradiction in this verse because it suggests that physical punishment can cleanse or purify a person. This idea can seem inconsistent with other biblical teachings that emphasize forgiveness, love, and transformation through spiritual means rather than physical suffering. The contradiction lies between the idea of physical pain bringing about moral or spiritual improvement and the broader biblical messages of inner change through non-violent means.
Paradox #3
Some interpretations of this verse might suggest that physical punishment leads to moral improvement, which can conflict with modern scientific understanding. Research in psychology and child development indicates that using physical punishment for behavior correction can be harmful, often leading to increased aggression, antisocial behavior, and mental health issues rather than moral or behavioral improvement.
Paradox #4
The contradiction in this verse comes from portraying physical punishment as a way to achieve moral improvement. This could be seen as conflicting with teachings about forgiveness, compassion, and non-violence, suggesting a tension between harsh discipline and more gentle, understanding approaches to personal growth and moral behavior.