Contradiction with Luke 15:11-24
This passage describes the parable of the Prodigal Son, where the son returns to his father after wasting his inheritance, and is received with forgiveness and celebration, contradicting the idea that returning to folly is inevitable.
Luke 15:11-24: And he said, A certain man had two sons:
Contradiction with 2 Corinthians 5:17
This verse states that anyone in Christ is a new creation and that old things have passed away, suggesting a transformation contrary to returning to one's folly.
2 Corinthians 5:17: Therefore if any man [be] in Christ, [he is] a new creature: old things are passed away; behold, all things are become new. [he is: or, let him be]
Contradiction with Philippians 3:13-14
These verses speak about forgetting what lies behind and pressing forward, which contradicts returning to one's past foolishness.
Philippians 3:13-14: Brethren, I count not myself to have apprehended: but [this] one thing [I do], forgetting those things which are behind, and reaching forth unto those things which are before,
Contradiction with Ephesians 4:22-24
These verses encourage putting off the old self and being renewed, which is opposite to repeating past folly.
Ephesians 4:22-24: That ye put off concerning the former conversation the old man, which is corrupt according to the deceitful lusts;
Contradiction with Isaiah 43:18-19
This passage encourages forgetfulness of the former things to focus on the new, opposing the idea of returning to foolish behaviors.
Isaiah 43:18-19: Remember ye not the former things, neither consider the things of old.
Paradox #1
The potential contradiction with Proverbs 26:11 could be seen in its portrayal of human folly and repeated mistakes, which might seem at odds with the idea of spiritual growth and redemption emphasized in other parts of the Bible. While the Bible encourages repentance and transformation, this verse suggests a pessimistic view of human nature's tendency to repeat foolish behavior. However, it's often interpreted as a warning rather than a contradiction, emphasizing the need for wisdom and change.
Paradox #2
The idea in Proverbs 26:11 illustrates a person repeating foolish actions, likening it to a dog returning to its vomit. A potential conflict might arise with verses that emphasize forgiveness and redemption, as one could question whether constant forgiveness encourages repeated mistakes without correction. However, this isn't a direct contradiction; it's more about balancing wisdom in avoiding repeated folly with the compassionate allowance for personal growth and change.
Paradox #3
The contradiction or conflict might be that while the verse criticizes repetitive foolish behavior, other parts of the Bible emphasize forgiveness and redemption. This could raise questions about balancing the judgment of foolish actions with the possibility of change and growth in a person.