Contradiction with Proverbs 26:4
This verse advises not to answer a fool according to his folly, which contrasts with the idea of using a rod for a fool's back as a form of correction.
Proverbs 26:4: Answer not a fool according to his folly, lest thou also be like unto him.
Contradiction with Proverbs 26:5
Proverbs 26:3 implies using physical discipline, whereas this verse suggests engaging with a fool's folly to prevent them from self-conceit.
Proverbs 26:5: Answer a fool according to his folly, lest he be wise in his own conceit. [conceit: Heb. eyes]
Contradiction with Matthew 5:39
This verse promotes turning the other cheek in the face of wrongdoing, directly opposing the notion of using a rod, or physical force, as indicated in Proverbs 26:3.
Matthew 5:39: But I say unto you, That ye resist not evil: but whosoever shall smite thee on thy right cheek, turn to him the other also.
Contradiction with Romans 12:19
Encourages leaving vengeance and retribution to God, conflicting with the idea of personally using a rod to correct a fool.
Romans 12:19: Dearly beloved, avenge not yourselves, but [rather] give place unto wrath: for it is written, Vengeance [is] mine; I will repay, saith the Lord.
Contradiction with James 1:19-20
Advises being slow to anger, contrasting the immediate, physical response suggested by using a rod for correction as stated in Proverbs 26:3.
James 1:19-20: Wherefore, my beloved brethren, let every man be swift to hear, slow to speak, slow to wrath:
Paradox #1
The contradiction or conflict in this verse could be seen in the idea of using physical punishment or strict control as a means of managing behavior. This might conflict with teachings that emphasize understanding, patience, and compassion in guiding others. The tension arises between using force versus using kindness and wisdom to influence actions.