Contradiction with Proverbs 13:24
Suggests sparing the rod is unfavorable, which supports Proverbs 29:15, making it not a contradiction itself.
Proverbs 13:24: He that spareth his rod hateth his son: but he that loveth him chasteneth him betimes.
Contradiction with Ephesians 6:4
Encourages raising children with gentle instruction rather than punitive discipline, differing from the notion of using a rod.
Ephesians 6:4: And, ye fathers, provoke not your children to wrath: but bring them up in the nurture and admonition of the Lord.
Contradiction with Colossians 3:21
Advises against provoking children, which contrasts with physical discipline implied in Proverbs 29:15.
Colossians 3:21: Fathers, provoke not your children [to anger], lest they be discouraged.
Contradiction with Matthew 18:6
Emphasizes severe consequences for harming children, conflicting with physical correction methods.
Matthew 18:6: But whoso shall offend one of these little ones which believe in me, it were better for him that a millstone were hanged about his neck, and [that] he were drowned in the depth of the sea.
Contradiction with James 1:20
States that human anger doesn't produce righteousness, which may contradict the implication of using force.
James 1:20: For the wrath of man worketh not the righteousness of God.
Paradox #1
Some people might see a contradiction between this verse and modern views on child-rearing. The verse suggests the importance of discipline, which some might interpret as endorsing physical punishment. However, contemporary views often emphasize positive reinforcement and non-physical methods of discipline, promoting a more nurturing and understanding approach. This creates a conflict between traditional and modern perspectives on how to guide and teach children.