Contradiction with Proverbs 29:17
This verse contradicts Proverbs 29:21 as it advises correcting a servant for peace and delight, rather than indulging them and facing future grief.
Proverbs 29:17: Correct thy son, and he shall give thee rest; yea, he shall give delight unto thy soul.
Contradiction with Proverbs 22:6
This verse suggests that training a child properly will lead to a proper outcome, in contrast to allowing a servant to become "a son at the length," as per Proverbs 29:21, which leads to grief.
Proverbs 22:6: Train up a child in the way he should go: and when he is old, he will not depart from it. [Train...: or, Catechise] [in...: Heb. in his way]
Contradiction with Proverbs 13:24
This verse supports the necessity of discipline, standing at odds with Proverbs 29:21, which implies indulgent treatment leads to eventual grief.
Proverbs 13:24: He that spareth his rod hateth his son: but he that loveth him chasteneth him betimes.
Contradiction with Proverbs 19:18
This verse encourages disciplining a son while there's hope, implying a structured upbringing contrasted against making a servant a son, which Proverbs 29:21 warns against.
Proverbs 19:18: Chasten thy son while there is hope, and let not thy soul spare for his crying. [for...: or, to his destruction: or, to cause him to die]
Paradox #1
The verse raises a potential contradiction or inconsistency in how it addresses the treatment and development of a servant, which may seem at odds with other Biblical teachings on fairness, compassion, and the inherent value of every person. The discrepancy might be in understanding how the guidance in this verse aligns with broader Biblical principles of equality and kindness.
Paradox #2
Proverbs 29:21 might be seen as conflicting when considering the Bible's teachings on kindness and equality. If interpreted as suggesting indulgence leads to negative outcomes, it could contradict messages about generosity or fair treatment of others, causing tension between discipline and compassion.