Contradiction with 1 Corinthians 7:1
This verse suggests that it is good for a man not to touch a woman, which contradicts the intimate relationship celebrated in Proverbs 5:19.
1 Corinthians 7:1: Now concerning the things whereof ye wrote unto me: [It is] good for a man not to touch a woman.
Contradiction with Matthew 19:12
This verse speaks of those who choose to live like eunuchs for the kingdom of heaven's sake, which contrasts with the marital delight in Proverbs 5:19.
Matthew 19:12: For there are some eunuchs, which were so born from [their] mother's womb: and there are some eunuchs, which were made eunuchs of men: and there be eunuchs, which have made themselves eunuchs for the kingdom of heaven's sake. He that is able to receive [it], let him receive [it].
Contradiction with 1 Thessalonians 4:3-4
This passage emphasizes sanctification and abstaining from fornication, which could be seen as opposing the physical pleasure encouraged in Proverbs 5:19 outside a proper context.
1 Thessalonians 4:3-4: For this is the will of God, [even] your sanctification, that ye should abstain from fornication:
Contradiction with Matthew 5:28
This verse warns against lustful thoughts, contrasting with the focus on physical attraction in Proverbs 5:19.
Matthew 5:28: But I say unto you, That whosoever looketh on a woman to lust after her hath committed adultery with her already in his heart.
Contradiction with 1 Corinthians 7:8-9
Paul suggests it is good for the unmarried and widows to remain single, differing from the marital satisfaction in Proverbs 5:19.
1 Corinthians 7:8-9: I say therefore to the unmarried and widows, It is good for them if they abide even as I.
Paradox #1
This verse could be seen as inconsistent with the broader Biblical teachings on relationships and the sanctity of marriage if it is interpreted in a way that objectifies or reduces a spouse to purely physical attributes, rather than promoting mutual respect and love.