Contradiction with Genesis 2:24
This verse contradicts Proverbs 5:20 as it emphasizes the unity and bond of a man and his wife, whereas Proverbs 5:20 warns against such intimacy with a stranger.
Genesis 2:24: Therefore shall a man leave his father and his mother, and shall cleave unto his wife: and they shall be one flesh.
Contradiction with Song of Solomon 7:10
This verse highlights mutual desire and belonging between lovers, contrasting with Proverbs 5:20's warning about embracing a stranger.
Song of Solomon 7:10: I [am] my beloved's, and his desire [is] toward me.
Contradiction with 1 Corinthians 7:3
This verse speaks of fulfilling marital duties, promoting marital intimacy, which indirectly counters the theme of estrangement suggested in Proverbs 5:20.
1 Corinthians 7:3: Let the husband render unto the wife due benevolence: and likewise also the wife unto the husband.
Contradiction with Ephesians 5:28
This verse encourages men to love their wives as their own bodies, suggesting devotion within marriage, unlike the allure of a stranger highlighted in Proverbs 5:20.
Ephesians 5:28: So ought men to love their wives as their own bodies. He that loveth his wife loveth himself.
Paradox #1
The potential contradiction in Proverbs 5:20 may arise when considering the Bible's teachings on love and relationships. This verse warns against immoral relationships, which could conflict with the New Testament's message of love, forgiveness, and redemption for all. Some might see tension between maintaining strict moral boundaries and offering grace to those who have fallen short. However, many believe these concepts can coexist, as moral guidance and forgiveness are both part of spiritual growth.
Paradox #2
Proverbs 5:20 advises against being captivated by a wayward woman or immoral partner, emphasizing faithfulness and moral integrity. A contradiction could arise if one values individual freedom and love above traditional notions of fidelity, creating a tension between personal desires and the moral teaching that urges commitment. This conflict highlights differing perspectives on personal relationships and moral obligations.