Contradiction with Matthew 18:8
This verse suggests removing body parts if they cause sin, contrasting with Proverbs 6:28, which highlights the inevitability of consequences from sinful actions.
Matthew 18:8: Wherefore if thy hand or thy foot offend thee, cut them off, and cast [them] from thee: it is better for thee to enter into life halt or maimed, rather than having two hands or two feet to be cast into everlasting fire.
Contradiction with James 4:7
It advocates resisting temptation and the devil, whereas Proverbs 6:28 implies inevitability and lack of control regarding the consequences of sinful actions.
James 4:7: Submit yourselves therefore to God. Resist the devil, and he will flee from you.
Contradiction with John 15:3
This verse presents the idea of purification through the word, suggesting redemption, contrasting with the idea in Proverbs 6:28 that engaging in sin will result in unavoidable harm.
John 15:3: Now ye are clean through the word which I have spoken unto you.
Contradiction with Romans 7:15
This verse expresses a struggle against sin and suggests a possibility of internal conflict, which contrasts with Proverbs 6:28's idea of straightforward consequences.
Romans 7:15: For that which I do I allow not: for what I would, that do I not; but what I hate, that do I. [allow: Gr. know]
Contradiction with 1 Corinthians 10:13
It suggests God will not allow one to be tempted beyond what they can bear and will provide a way out, which contrasts with the inevitability of harm in Proverbs 6:28.
1 Corinthians 10:13: There hath no temptation taken you but such as is common to man: but God [is] faithful, who will not suffer you to be tempted above that ye are able; but will with the temptation also make a way to escape, that ye may be able to bear [it]. [common...: or, moderate]
Paradox #1
The contradiction in that verse can be seen in the broader biblical teachings on forgiveness and grace. While the verse warns about the inevitable consequences of certain actions, other parts of the Bible emphasize forgiveness and the possibility of redemption. This could seem inconsistent because one part highlights unavoidable consequences, while another speaks about second chances and forgiveness.