Contradiction with Isaiah 1:18
This verse invites reasoning and forgiveness for sins, while Psalms 101:7 emphasizes exclusion and rejection of deceitful individuals.
Isaiah 1:18: Come now, and let us reason together, saith the LORD: though your sins be as scarlet, they shall be as white as snow; though they be red like crimson, they shall be as wool.
Contradiction with Matthew 9:13
While Psalms 101:7 stresses not allowing deceitful people to dwell in the house, this verse emphasizes mercy and calls sinners to repentance.
Matthew 9:13: But go ye and learn what [that] meaneth, I will have mercy, and not sacrifice: for I am not come to call the righteous, but sinners to repentance.
Contradiction with Luke 19:10
Contradicts Psalms 101:7 by stating the Son of Man came to seek and save the lost, whereas Psalms 101:7 implies exclusion of evildoers.
Luke 19:10: For the Son of man is come to seek and to save that which was lost.
Contradiction with John 8:7
Highlights forgiveness and not casting judgment, whereas Psalms 101:7 suggests a stern rejection of falsehood.
John 8:7: So when they continued asking him, he lifted up himself, and said unto them, He that is without sin among you, let him first cast a stone at her.
Paradox #1
The verse in question deals with the theme of honesty and truthfulness. A possible contradiction could arise when comparing it to verses that emphasize God's forgiveness and redemption. Some might see a conflict between the strict stance on truth in this verse and the broader biblical message of grace and forgiveness for sinners who repent. However, these themes can be harmonized by understanding that the call for honesty is part of living a righteous life, while forgiveness is available for those who seek it.
Paradox #2
The contradiction or conflict in the verse could involve the strict stance against deceit and falsehood. In everyday life, people might struggle to uphold absolute honesty due to complex situations that require nuance, such as protecting someone's feelings or ensuring safety through a lie. Thus, the challenge lies in balancing the ideal of complete honesty with real-world complexities where some degree of deception might seem necessary or justifiable.