Contradiction with Proverbs 11:14
This verse suggests that safety is found in having many counselors, implying trust in human leaders, which contradicts Psalms 146:3's caution against trusting in mortal man.
Proverbs 11:14: Where no counsel [is], the people fall: but in the multitude of counsellors [there is] safety.
Contradiction with Romans 13:1
This verse instructs believers to be subject to governing authorities, suggesting a level of trust in human authority, which contradicts Psalms 146:3's directive not to put trust in princes.
Romans 13:1: Let every soul be subject unto the higher powers. For there is no power but of God: the powers that be are ordained of God. [ordained: or, ordered]
Contradiction with Exodus 18:21
This verse advises the selection of capable men to lead, implying trust in human leadership, which contrasts with Psalms 146:3's warning against placing trust in earthly rulers.
Exodus 18:21: Moreover thou shalt provide out of all the people able men, such as fear God, men of truth, hating covetousness; and place [such] over them, [to be] rulers of thousands, [and] rulers of hundreds, rulers of fifties, and rulers of tens:
Contradiction with 1 Peter 2:13-14
This verse calls for submission to every human institution, including rulers, suggesting trust in their governance, which contradicts the warning in Psalms 146:3 against trusting human leaders.
1 Peter 2:13-14: Submit yourselves to every ordinance of man for the Lord's sake: whether it be to the king, as supreme;
Paradox #1
Psalms 146:3 advises against putting trust in human leaders for salvation. A potential contradiction could arise when comparing this idea to other parts of the Bible that instruct believers to respect and follow human authority, like Romans 13:1-2. The challenge is reconciling the instruction to trust God over human leaders with the directive to submit to earthly authority. This raises questions about the balance between divine trust and human loyalty.
Paradox #2
Psalms 146:3 advises not to put trust in human leaders for salvation, as they are mortal and limited. This could conflict with teachings that encourage respecting and trusting in human authorities or leaders, such as Romans 13:1-2, which speaks about being subject to governing authorities as instituted by God. The contradiction lies in the different levels of trust or reliance suggested regarding human figures.
Paradox #3
The potential contradiction or inconsistency with Psalms 146:3 could be seen in the reliance on human leaders throughout biblical history. While this verse advises not to put trust in princes or mortal men, the Bible also describes figures like King David or Moses as God-chosen leaders whom people followed. This could seem inconsistent because, on one hand, followers are warned against placing trust in human leaders, yet they are encouraged to follow divinely appointed ones. This could be seen as a conflict between divine guidance through human leaders and the caution against trusting in them.
Paradox #4
The contradiction or conflict in this verse might arise when considering the necessity of human leaders and institutions in society. While the verse suggests relying on God rather than trusting in human leaders, it might conflict with the practical need to trust and support human institutions for governance, justice, and societal functioning. Balancing faith in divine guidance with the reality of human leadership could present a moral tension.