Contradiction with Isaiah 49:15
This verse states that a mother will not forget her nursing child, suggesting an everlasting bond, whereas Psalms 27:10 speaks to the possibility of parents forsaking their child.
Isaiah 49:15: Can a woman forget her sucking child, that she should not have compassion on the son of her womb? yea, they may forget, yet will I not forget thee. [that...: Heb. from having compassion]
Contradiction with James 1:17
This verse states that every perfect gift is from above and speaks to the unchanging nature of God, whereas Psalms 27:10 implies human relationship instability.
James 1:17: Every good gift and every perfect gift is from above, and cometh down from the Father of lights, with whom is no variableness, neither shadow of turning.
Contradiction with Deuteronomy 31:6
This verse emphasizes that God will never leave nor forsake you, contrasting the idea of parental abandonment mentioned in Psalms 27:10.
Deuteronomy 31:6: Be strong and of a good courage, fear not, nor be afraid of them: for the LORD thy God, he [it is] that doth go with thee; he will not fail thee, nor forsake thee.
Contradiction with Hebrews 13:5
This verse assures that God will never leave nor forsake, suggesting divine permanence in contrast to human parental abandonment in Psalms 27:10.
Hebrews 13:5: [Let your] conversation [be] without covetousness; [and be] content with such things as ye have: for he hath said, I will never leave thee, nor forsake thee.
Contradiction with Matthew 28:20
This verse contains the promise of Jesus's presence "always, even unto the end of the world," contrasting the conditional human support expressed in Psalms 27:10.
Matthew 28:20: Teaching them to observe all things whatsoever I have commanded you: and, lo, I am with you alway, [even] unto the end of the world. Amen.