Contradiction with Exodus 17:3
While Psalms 105:41 describes water being provided, Exodus 17:3 mentions the Israelites complaining about the lack of water.
Exodus 17:3: And the people thirsted there for water; and the people murmured against Moses, and said, Wherefore [is] this [that] thou hast brought us up out of Egypt, to kill us and our children and our cattle with thirst?
Contradiction with Psalm 78:32
Despite miracles such as providing water, this verse highlights that the Israelites continued to sin.
Psalm 78:32: For all this they sinned still, and believed not for his wondrous works.
Contradiction with Numbers 20:11-12
Unlike the miraculous provision without consequence in Psalms 105:41, this account led to Moses' punishment for striking the rock.
Numbers 20:11-12: And Moses lifted up his hand, and with his rod he smote the rock twice: and the water came out abundantly, and the congregation drank, and their beasts [also].
Contradiction with Isaiah 5:6
Contradicting the provision of water, this verse describes a lack of rain and desolation.
Isaiah 5:6: And I will lay it waste: it shall not be pruned, nor digged; but there shall come up briers and thorns: I will also command the clouds that they rain no rain upon it.
Paradox #1
Psalms 105:41 talks about a miracle where water is provided from a rock. The contradiction or inconsistency might arise when comparing it with other historical records or scientific understanding, which might not have evidence of such an event occurring naturally. Additionally, variations in the way this story is told across different texts in the Bible can lead to inconsistencies.
Paradox #2
The verse describes a miraculous event involving water flowing from a rock. Scientifically, this could be seen as inconsistent with natural geological processes, where water does not typically flow from solid rocks without an external source or pressure causing it, such as the presence of an underground aquifer or significant geological activity. Thus, attributing this event to a supernatural cause could be considered inconsistent with scientific explanations of how water sources function.