Contradiction with 2 Thessalonians 3:10
This verse emphasizes that if anyone will not work, neither should he eat, contradicting the notion of receiving lands without labor, as mentioned in Psalms 105:44.
2 Thessalonians 3:10: For even when we were with you, this we commanded you, that if any would not work, neither should he eat.
Contradiction with Proverbs 13:11
This verse highlights the value of honest labor over wealth gained through vanity or without work, contradicting the gift of lands without toil in Psalms 105:44.
Proverbs 13:11: Wealth [gotten] by vanity shall be diminished: but he that gathereth by labour shall increase. [by labour: Heb. with the hand]
Contradiction with Genesis 3:19
This verse speaks of earning by the sweat of the brow, a concept at odds with the idea of receiving lands by inheritance without working for them as described in Psalms 105:44.
Genesis 3:19: In the sweat of thy face shalt thou eat bread, till thou return unto the ground; for out of it wast thou taken: for dust thou [art], and unto dust shalt thou return.
Contradiction with Proverbs 10:4
It implies that diligent work leads to wealth, contradicting the effortless inheritance of lands noted in Psalms 105:44.
Proverbs 10:4: He becometh poor that dealeth [with] a slack hand: but the hand of the diligent maketh rich.
Paradox #1
Psalms 105:44 may raise questions about fairness or justice because it talks about one group of people benefiting from the hard work of another group. This could be seen as inconsistent with moral teachings that emphasize fairness and equality.