Contradiction with Proverbs 12:21
This verse states that no harm befalls the righteous, whereas Psalms 106:17 depicts harm befalling individuals due to sin.
Proverbs 12:21: There shall no evil happen to the just: but the wicked shall be filled with mischief.
Contradiction with Isaiah 3:10
This verse says the righteous will be well and will eat the fruits of their deeds, contrasting with those consumed in wrath in Psalms 106:17.
Isaiah 3:10: Say ye to the righteous, that [it shall be] well [with him]: for they shall eat the fruit of their doings.
Contradiction with Job 5:19
This verse suggests God will deliver people from harm, contradicting the fate of those in Psalms 106:17.
Job 5:19: He shall deliver thee in six troubles: yea, in seven there shall no evil touch thee.
Contradiction with Psalms 91:10
This verse promises no evil will befall those who trust in God, differing from the individuals in Psalms 106:17 who face dire consequences.
Psalms 91:10: There shall no evil befall thee, neither shall any plague come nigh thy dwelling.
Paradox #1
Psalms 106:17 refers to the earth swallowing up rebellious people, which might conflict with historical or geological records if taken literally, as there may not be evidence of such events occurring as described. Additionally, the story it alludes to, involving people like Korah in other biblical texts, might raise questions about historical accuracy or consistency across different biblical accounts.
Paradox #2
The contradiction in Psalms 106:17 could relate to the earth opening up to swallow people, which is inconsistent with geological understanding. In geology, the earth does not suddenly open and close to swallow individuals; such events are not observed in natural processes.
Paradox #3
The contradiction in the verse could be the depiction of divine punishment that might seem harsh or unfair by modern ethical standards; such actions might conflict with the idea of a loving and forgiving deity.