Contradiction with Exodus 20:13
Psalms 106:38 mentions shedding innocent blood, while Exodus 20:13 commands, "Thou shalt not kill," indicating a prohibition against killing.
Exodus 20:13: Thou shalt not kill.
Contradiction with Proverbs 6:16-17
This passage states that God hates "hands that shed innocent blood," in contrast to the actions condemned in Psalms 106:38.
Proverbs 6:16-17: These six [things] doth the LORD hate: yea, seven [are] an abomination unto him: [unto...: Heb. of his soul]
Contradiction with Ezekiel 18:20
It states that "The soul that sinneth, it shall die," focusing on personal responsibility, which contradicts the collective guilt of shedding innocent blood in Psalms 106:38.
Ezekiel 18:20: The soul that sinneth, it shall die. The son shall not bear the iniquity of the father, neither shall the father bear the iniquity of the son: the righteousness of the righteous shall be upon him, and the wickedness of the wicked shall be upon him.
Contradiction with Deuteronomy 27:25
Declares a curse on those who take a bribe to slay an innocent person, contrasting with the shedding of innocent blood described in Psalms 106:38.
Deuteronomy 27:25: Cursed [be] he that taketh reward to slay an innocent person. And all the people shall say, Amen.
Contradiction with Genesis 9:6
This verse emphasizes, "Whoso sheddeth man's blood, by man shall his blood be shed," highlighting divine justice against murder, unlike the acts in Psalms 106:38.
Genesis 9:6: Whoso sheddeth man's blood, by man shall his blood be shed: for in the image of God made he man.
Paradox #1
Psalms 106:38 talks about the shedding of innocent blood and idolatry. A possible contradiction could be with the overall Biblical theme of God being merciful and forgiving, as this verse highlights actions that are clearly condemned and seen as severe sins. The tension between God's justice and mercy might be seen as inconsistent by some, as it raises questions about how God addresses sin versus forgiveness.
Paradox #2
Psalms 106:38 speaks of the shedding of innocent blood. One possible contradiction could arise when comparing this with stories in the Bible where God commands warfare or destruction. Some may see a conflict between condemning the shedding of innocent blood and instances where such actions are commanded or allowed by God. This can lead to questions about the consistency of moral teachings in the Bible regarding violence and justice.
Paradox #3
Psalms 106:38 might be seen as inconsistent or contradictory due to historical or ethical perspectives on the acts it describes. The verse deals with the theme of human sacrifice, which conflicts with the broader Biblical teachings against such practices. Additionally, it raises questions about the historical accuracy of the events described, as there is limited archaeological evidence supporting the widespread occurrence of these practices among the Israelites during the times referenced. Thus, some readers may find historical or ethical contradictions in interpreting this verse.
Paradox #4
Psalms 106:38 talks about the shedding of innocent blood. A moral conflict might arise from the Bible sometimes depicting God commanding wars or punishments that result in loss of life. This can seem inconsistent with the value placed on innocent life in this verse.