Contradiction with Proverbs 8:29
While Psalms 106:9 describes God's control over natural waters, Proverbs 8:29 speaks of God setting boundaries for the sea, implying it is bound, not just controlled.
Proverbs 8:29: When he gave to the sea his decree, that the waters should not pass his commandment: when he appointed the foundations of the earth:
Contradiction with Ecclesiastes 1:7
Psalms 106:9 portrays the waters as obediently parting, whereas Ecclesiastes 1:7 suggests a natural cycle where waters return to their source, possibly implying predestination rather than command.
Ecclesiastes 1:7: All the rivers run into the sea; yet the sea [is] not full; unto the place from whence the rivers come, thither they return again. [return...: Heb. return to go]
Contradiction with Jeremiah 5:22
In contrast to Psalms 106:9, Jeremiah 5:22 describes the sea as being placed behind an eternal boundary, suggesting a form of control that doesn't require active command over the waters.
Jeremiah 5:22: Fear ye not me? saith the LORD: will ye not tremble at my presence, which have placed the sand [for] the bound of the sea by a perpetual decree, that it cannot pass it: and though the waves thereof toss themselves, yet can they not prevail; though they roar, yet can they not pass over it?
Contradiction with Isaiah 48:18
While Psalms 106:9 depicts control over waters as an example of God's power, Isaiah 48:18 uses the imagery of a peaceful river to illustrate obedience, with a focus on human rather than natural elements.
Isaiah 48:18: O that thou hadst hearkened to my commandments! then had thy peace been as a river, and thy righteousness as the waves of the sea:
Contradiction with Job 38:8-11
Psalms 106:9 shows water parting at God's command, yet Job 38:8-11 emphasizes the setting of permanent limits to the sea, contrasting with the notion of water parting at command.
Job 38:8-11: Or [who] shut up the sea with doors, when it brake forth, [as if] it had issued out of the womb?
Paradox #1
The verse talks about a miraculous event involving control over nature, such as dividing a body of water. From a scientific standpoint, this contradicts our understanding of natural laws, as it describes an event that does not align with physical principles or evidence-based explanations. Miracles, by definition, are beyond scientific explanation as they involve supernatural intervention.