Contradiction with Philippians 4:19
Contradicts as it suggests that God will supply all our needs, focusing on needs beyond just food.
Philippians 4:19: But my God shall supply all your need according to his riches in glory by Christ Jesus.
Contradiction with Matthew 6:31-32
Contradicts by emphasizing not to worry about food, implying God will provide for all needs, not just food.
Matthew 6:31-32: Therefore take no thought, saying, What shall we eat? or, What shall we drink? or, Wherewithal shall we be clothed?
Contradiction with Proverbs 13:25
Contradicts in highlighting that not everyone is satisfied; the wicked do not always get their fill.
Proverbs 13:25: The righteous eateth to the satisfying of his soul: but the belly of the wicked shall want.
Contradiction with Proverbs 10:3
Contradicts by asserting the Lord will not allow the righteous to famish, suggesting direct provision.
Proverbs 10:3: The LORD will not suffer the soul of the righteous to famish: but he casteth away the substance of the wicked. [the substance...: or, the wicked for their wickedness]
Contradiction with Lamentations 4:9
Contradicts by depicting the starvation of people indicating not all are fed.
Lamentations 4:9: [They that be] slain with the sword are better than [they that be] slain with hunger: for these pine away, stricken through for [want of] the fruits of the field. [pine...: Heb. flow out]
Paradox #1
The verse suggests that God provides food to those who fear Him. A potential contradiction could be that food availability is generally explained by natural processes and socioeconomic factors rather than divine intervention. That being said, interpreting these verses often involves understanding religious beliefs rather than direct scientific analysis.