Contradiction with Proverbs 10:25
Proverbs 10:25 suggests that the righteous have an everlasting foundation, contrary to the idea of foundations being destroyed in Psalms 11:3.
Proverbs 10:25: As the whirlwind passeth, so [is] the wicked no [more]: but the righteous [is] an everlasting foundation.
Contradiction with Matthew 7:24-25
Matthew 7:24-25 emphasizes that a house built on a solid foundation stands firm, contradicting the possibility of foundations being destroyed.
Matthew 7:24-25: Therefore whosoever heareth these sayings of mine, and doeth them, I will liken him unto a wise man, which built his house upon a rock:
Contradiction with Isaiah 28:16
Isaiah 28:16 speaks of a firm and sure foundation laid by God, opposing the notion of foundations being destroyed.
Isaiah 28:16: Therefore thus saith the Lord GOD, Behold, I lay in Zion for a foundation a stone, a tried stone, a precious corner [stone], a sure foundation: he that believeth shall not make haste.
Contradiction with 2 Timothy 2:19
2 Timothy 2:19 states that the foundation of God stands sure, contradicting the doubt in foundations presented in Psalms 11:3.
2 Timothy 2:19: Nevertheless the foundation of God standeth sure, having this seal, The Lord knoweth them that are his. And, Let every one that nameth the name of Christ depart from iniquity. [sure: or, steady]
Paradox #1
"Psalms 11:3" raises a question about the foundations being destroyed and what the righteous can do. Some might see a potential conflict or inconsistency in understanding whether human actions can influence divine plans or protect righteousness in times of moral decay. It challenges the balance between faith in divine protection and the role of human responsibility.
Paradox #2
The potential contradiction or conflict in Psalms 11:3 could arise if the foundations mentioned are seen as outdated or no longer applicable, leading to questions about what moral or social principles should guide people today. If the foundations are perceived as unjust or inadequate in modern contexts, that could cause tension between traditional interpretations and contemporary values.